MSI 870A-G54 (MS-7599)

Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Battle cruiser	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	16.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	75.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	MSI MS-7599
Motherboard	MSI 870A-G54 (MS-7599) (all builds)
Memory	5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121127
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 03 '19 at 10:20
Run Duration	169 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T-$240 23,506 User benchmarks, average bench 57% CPU1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	63.2% Good	Memory 91.7 1-Core 47.4 2-Core 94.5 52% 77.9 Pts	4-Core 190 8-Core 283 29% 236 Pts	64-Core 282 18% 282 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 63.2% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 6870 25,443 User benchmarks, average bench 15% Sapphire(174B 174B) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	16.8% Very poor	Lighting 22.7 Reflection 15.5 Parallax 19.7 18% 19.3 fps	MRender 13.1 Gravity 15.6 Splatting 20 14% 16.2 fps
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 16.8% Great: 16%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 127GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 235 266 260 282 279 270 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	75.2% Very good	Read 388 Write 364 Mixed 313 SusWrite 265 75% 333 MB/s	4K Read 32 4K Write 56.8 4K Mixed 39.9 130% 42.9 MB/s	DQ Read 39.7 DQ Write 86.4 DQ Mixed 52.4 43% 59.5 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 75.2% Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51 462,780 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 193GB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 114 114 114 115 114 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	64.7% Good	Read 111 Write 72.2 Mixed 60.6 SusWrite 114 66% 89.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 64.7% Great: 114%
WD Elements 25A1 2TB 7,574 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 535GB free, PID 25a1 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 16 16 16 16 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	13.1% Very poor	Read 27.8 Write 27.2 Mixed 24.3 SusWrite 15.5 32% 23.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 13.1% Great: 58%
Samsung M3 Portable 2TB 5,095 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 485GB free, PID 61b5 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 27 28 28 28 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	15.7% Very poor	Read 28.1 Write 28.9 Mixed 26.6 SusWrite 27.3 38% 27.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 94% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 15.7% Great: 52%
WD Elements 500GB 10,869 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 105GB free, PID 1023 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 15 14 15 15 15 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	12.2% Very poor	Read 27.3 Write 25.8 Mixed 21.9 SusWrite 14.6 30% 22.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.6 77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 12.2% Great: 41%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB 9,994 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM 1600 MHz Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	34.6% Below average	MC Read 15.2 MC Write 6.8 MC Mixed 12.9 33% 11.6 GB/s	SC Read 7.8 SC Write 5.8 SC Mixed 9.8 22% 7.8 GB/s	Latency 64.6 62% 64.6 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 34.6% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 870A-G54 (MS-7599) Builds (Compare 57 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI 870A-G54 (MS-7599)

CPU
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples	11x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	8x
Phenom II X6 1055TAMD $175Bench 54%, 23,835 samples	6x

GPU
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	4x
GTX 760Nvidia $209Bench 26%, 161,132 samples	3x
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples	3x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	2x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	2x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	2x

RAM
Adata DDR3 1600G Adata DDR3 1600G 12GBUnknownBench 33%, 5 samples	2x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	1x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 47% - Average

Total price: $177

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16