Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results


Gaming 77% Battleship	Desktop 104% UFO	Workstation 73% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	69.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	152% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

System	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER
Motherboard	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER (all builds)
Memory	12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181218
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 03 '19 at 06:42
Run Duration	192 Seconds
Run User	PAN-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	Memory 93.4 1-Core 159 2-Core 319 103% 191 Pts	4-Core 631 8-Core 993 100% 812 Pts	64-Core 1,320 82% 1,320 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Asus(1043 85A0) CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.71 Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	69.4% Good	Lighting 86.4 Reflection 97.3 Parallax 82.7 70% 88.8 fps	MRender 82.5 Gravity 81 Splatting 83.2 67% 82.2 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 69.4% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX6000 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$40 8,737 User benchmarks, average bench 119% 182GB free (System drive) Firmware: V6005-ac Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 791 804 796 678 811 714 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	152% Outstanding	Read 629 Write 712 Mixed 613 SusWrite 766 154% 680 MB/s	4K Read 42.1 4K Write 133 4K Mixed 55.5 206% 77 MB/s	DQ Read 381 DQ Write 398 DQ Mixed 292 247% 357 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 152% Great: 153%
WD WD1600JS-75NCB1 160GB 10,689 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 9GB free Firmware: 02.01C03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 55 54 55 57 56 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	31.9% Below average	Read 56 Write 53.2 Mixed 40.2 SusWrite 54.9 38% 51.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.9 149% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 31.9% Great: 35%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29 203,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 18GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 77 57 59 58 64 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	38.2% Below average	Read 69 Write 69.2 Mixed 52 SusWrite 63.6 47% 63.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1 179% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 38.2% Great: 69%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100 65,786 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 21GB free Firmware: 1AA01118 SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 55 54 55 55 55 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	31.8% Below average	Read 56 Write 52.3 Mixed 40 SusWrite 54.3 37% 50.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 31.8% Great: 62%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83 138,859 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 72GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 78 80 80 80 79 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	56.5% Above average	Read 118 Write 140 Mixed 71.2 SusWrite 78.9 75% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.2 217% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 56.5% Great: 75%
WD easystore 25FB 4TB 3,961 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2TB free, PID 25fb Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 146 148 147 147 148 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	55.5% Above average	Read 109 Write 110 Mixed 93.5 SusWrite 147 159% 115 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 119% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 55.5% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2133 C14 2x8GB 49,673 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3100 MHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	84.6% Excellent	MC Read 33.4 MC Write 32.5 MC Mixed 22.9 85% 29.6 GB/s	SC Read 19.4 SC Write 34.2 SC Mixed 28.5 78% 27.4 GB/s	Latency 61.2 65% 61.2 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 84.6% Great: 80%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS MASTER-CF Builds (Compare 8,497 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 152%

UFO

Desktop 102%

UFO

Workstation 151%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER - $396

CPU
Core i9-9900KIntel $410Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	4,861x
Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	1,609x
Core i9-9900KFIntel $295Bench 98%, 50,265 samples	556x

GPU
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	1,303x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	650x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	640x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	856x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	566x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	487x

RAM
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 92,358 samples	289x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	278x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	254x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $1,342

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16