Medion MD34059/C613

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics28.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive82.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemMedion MD34059/C613  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION Z370H4-EM
Memory0.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170908
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateFeb 03 '19 at 00:04
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 65%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$131
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
63.4% Good
Memory 61.1
1-Core 114
2-Core 228
72% 134 Pts
4-Core 352
8-Core 649
60% 501 Pts
64-Core 655
40% 655 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Sapphire(174B 6438) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 417.35
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.9% Poor
Lighting 25.1
Reflection 20.9
Parallax 53.1
20% 33 fps
MRender 66
Gravity 56.6
Splatting 47.5
45% 56.7 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$49
87GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PSF121C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 413 152 83 214 67 93 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Read 592
Write 437
Mixed 470
SusWrite 170
93% 417 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 76.2
4K Mixed 25
102% 40.2 MB/s
DQ Read 278
DQ Write 492
DQ Mixed 323
263% 364 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 157%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 137 147 151 125 135 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
90% Excellent
Read 174
Write 194
Mixed 41.5
SusWrite 139
99% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.5
128% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 90%
Great: 108%
2GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3 4.7 5.5 4.5 5 5.3 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 12.8
Write 4.2
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 4.6
9% 7.53 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Mixed 0
7% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 15%
USB DISK 3.0 32GB
18GB free, PID 6300
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 15 19 12 14 19 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
17.3% Very poor
Read 79.2
Write 8.3
Mixed 15.3
SusWrite 15
29% 29.5 MB/s
4K Read 5.6
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 2.1
106% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905678-012.A00G 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
35.3% Below average
MC Read 14.6
MC Write 13.2
MC Mixed 11.2
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 7.6
22% 7.53 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MD34059/C613 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

System: Medion MD34059/C613

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $299
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback