Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	32.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X6 1100T-$340 12,769 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Socket M2, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	52.6% Above average	Memory 78.3 1-Core 47.2 2-Core 88.1 47% 71.2 Pts	4-Core 153 8-Core 188 22% 170 Pts	64-Core 224 14% 224 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 52.6% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 3351) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.11 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	32.3% Below average	Lighting 41.4 Reflection 28.6 Parallax 34.8 34% 34.9 fps	MRender 35.4 Gravity 39.2 Splatting 34.2 30% 36.3 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 32.3% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 2GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 427 Write 190 Mixed 359 72% 326 MB/s	4K Read 30.1 4K Write 54.8 4K Mixed 34.8 119% 39.9 MB/s	DQ Read 241 DQ Write 202 DQ Mixed 227 168% 223 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
WD Elements 25A1 4TB 8,402 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 2.5TB free, PID 25a1 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 13 15 12 15 20 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	8.13% Terrible	Read 10 Write 5.2 Mixed 12 SusWrite 14.9 15% 10.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.2 45% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 8.13% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	28.7% Poor	MC Read 12.5 MC Write 6.2 MC Mixed 10.7 28% 9.8 GB/s	SC Read 6.1 SC Write 5.3 SC Mixed 7.5 18% 6.3 GB/s	Latency 83.7 48% 83.7 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 28.7% Great: 45%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $440

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16