| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
| System | Supermicro X9DRG-QF (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Supermicro X9DRG-QF |
| Memory | 59.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20150325 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 01 '19 at 01:25 |
| Run Duration | 114 Seconds |
| Run User | CAN-User |
| Background CPU | 2% |
PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
|
61.1%
Good
|
58% 103 Pts
|
58% 489 Pts
|
156% 2525 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
102%
Outstanding
|
108% 134 fps
|
93% 115 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SanDisk Ultra 3D 1TB-$67
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 70RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 452 441 461 471 471 473 MB/s
|
106%
Outstanding
|
96% 427 MB/s
|
139% 47.6 MB/s
|
205% 308 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hynix HMT41GU7MFR8C-PB 8x8GB
8 of 16 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
54.7%
Above average
|
61% 21.5 GB/s
|
24% 8.37 GB/s
|
31% 128 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical X9DRG-QF Builds (Compare 13 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Supermicro X9DRG-QF
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 01stBench 55%, 2,873 samples | 3x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 v21stBench 63%, 551 samples | 3x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697 v21stBench 64%, 772 samples | 3x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Quadro K5000NvidiaBench 21%, 3,775 samples | 2x |
| GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 2x |
| GTX 780-TiNvidia $410Bench 53%, 30,815 samples | 1x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 34% - Below average | Total price: $130 |