Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI

Performance Results


Gaming 55% Gunboat	Desktop 90% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 50% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	56.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI
Motherboard	Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI (all builds)
Memory	20.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	3840 x 1620 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180510
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Jan 30 '19 at 19:38
Run Duration	200 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	20%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$155 179,588 User benchmarks, average bench 73% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	84.8% Excellent	Memory 88.6 1-Core 116 2-Core 228 82% 144 Pts	4-Core 437 8-Core 662 68% 549 Pts	64-Core 924 57% 924 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 84.8% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Gigabyte(1458 22F1) CLim: 1365 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.1.1 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	56.2% Above average	Lighting 70.8 Reflection 70.1 Parallax 89.9 58% 76.9 fps	MRender 70.4 Gravity 71.7 Splatting 56.4 53% 66.2 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 56.2% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 110GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 324 234 253 245 253 240 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 496 Write 477 Mixed 341 SusWrite 258 88% 393 MB/s	4K Read 38.1 4K Write 87.5 4K Mixed 49.9 168% 58.5 MB/s	DQ Read 379 DQ Write 348 DQ Mixed 208 199% 312 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 118%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 230GB free Firmware: EXT0BB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 402 278 277 277 278 277 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	108% Outstanding	Read 456 Write 462 Mixed 390 SusWrite 298 90% 402 MB/s	4K Read 39.3 4K Write 91.7 4K Mixed 52.3 175% 61.1 MB/s	DQ Read 382 DQ Write 362 DQ Mixed 230 212% 325 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 118%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$92 154,949 User benchmarks, average bench 235% 233GB free Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1168 428 306 306 308 307 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	185% Outstanding	Read 1,345 Write 1,211 Mixed 1,004 SusWrite 471 225% 1,008 MB/s	4K Read 52.1 4K Write 114 4K Mixed 67.2 226% 77.8 MB/s	DQ Read 773 DQ Write 685 DQ Mixed 698 532% 719 MB/s
Poor: 160% ↑ This bench: 185% Great: 280%
WD WD20EURS-63S48Y0 2TB 12,928 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 2TB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 112 113 112 113 113 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	63.7% Good	Read 109 Write 114 Mixed 99.5 SusWrite 112 81% 109 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.8 156% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 63.7% Great: 77%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 143 143 145 147 148 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	84.4% Excellent	Read 149 Write 135 Mixed 82.3 SusWrite 145 94% 128 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1.1 205% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 84.4% Great: 84%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 16GB 2,737 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 0GB free, PID 007a Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 18.3 Write 3 Mixed 7 9% 9.43 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 3% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3200 C16 Series 3200 C16 Series 3200 C16 Series 3200 C16 Series 24GB 45 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz 4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	113% Outstanding	MC Read 44.7 MC Write 42.1 MC Mixed 36.9 118% 41.2 GB/s	SC Read 27.2 SC Write 41.9 SC Mixed 32.6 97% 33.9 GB/s	Latency 68.9 58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 114%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 858 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 81%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI - $475

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	268x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	87x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	80x

GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	60x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	44x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	44x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	39x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	38x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	35x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	38x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	37x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	33x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 107% - Outstanding

Total price: $971

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI - $475

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)