PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 5.96% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus M5A78L-M/USB3 (all builds) |
Memory | 13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20141202 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jan 30 '19 at 17:32 |
Run Duration | 512 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 15% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
61.6%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Radeon HD 7670
AMD(1002 7600) ≥ 4GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
|
5.96%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung HD402LJ 400GB
343GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CT100-11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0.4 78 76 MB/s
|
20.1%
Poor
|
|||
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$24
466GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 1.3 108 108 MB/s
|
40.7%
Average
|
|||
Seagate Expansion 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: 0708
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 27 28 28 29 MB/s
|
13%
Very poor
|
|||
35.1%
Below average
|
||||
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID a200
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 88 97 55 73 MB/s
|
22.8%
Poor
|
|||
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
2TB free, PID a200
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 80 77 107 110 MB/s
|
29.8%
Poor
|
|||
TOSHIBA MQ01ABF050 500GB
459GB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 41 36 91 111 MB/s
|
26.1%
Poor
|
|||
Seagate Expansion Desk 2TB
2TB free, PID 3321
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 135 129 92 92 MB/s
|
58%
Above average
|
|||
General UDisk 2TB
2TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 3.3 2.4 1.2 MB/s
|
2.41%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
|
43.7%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 504x |
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 324x |
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 185x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples | 139x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 127x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 89x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $171 |