Asus H97M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics18.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus H97M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140522
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 30 '19 at 15:11
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4330-$140
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
57.5% Above average
Memory 91.7
1-Core 58.6
2-Core 90.2
54% 80.2 Pts
4-Core 139
8-Core 138
18% 138 Pts
64-Core 129
8% 129 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.1.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
18.2% Very poor
Lighting 0.07
Reflection 69.7
Parallax 98.2
0% 56 fps
MRender 71.4
Gravity 71.6
Splatting 56.8
54% 66.6 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$250
178GB free
Firmware: 2B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 533 552 556 578 569 559 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
145% Outstanding
Read 663
Write 581
Mixed 429
SusWrite 558
125% 558 MB/s
4K Read 39.7
4K Write 144
4K Mixed 48.6
198% 77.3 MB/s
DQ Read 781
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 373
324% 493 MB/s
Poor: 131%
This bench: 145%
Great: 243%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
309GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 76 52 68 83 92 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
51.2% Above average
Read 108
Write 118
Mixed 82.9
SusWrite 69.5
70% 94.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
189% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 85%
Toshiba MK5059GSXP 500GB-$50
465GB free
Firmware: GN001U
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 76 76 77 77 77 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
43.6% Average
Read 75.8
Write 71.2
Mixed 19.6
SusWrite 76.2
44% 60.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
109% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Sniper DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
54% Above average
MC Read 19
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 19.8
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 16.6
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 64.7
62% 64.7 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 54%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H97M-PLUS Builds (Compare 972 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H97M-PLUS - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $390
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback