Samsung 700G7C

Performance Results


Gaming 15% Surfboard	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	14% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	74.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Samsung 700G7C (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG SAMSUNG_NP1234567890
Memory	8.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140311
Uptime	6.6 Days
Run Date	Jan 30 '19 at 10:03
Run Duration	139 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	50%

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420 65,927 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	70% Good	Memory 86.6 1-Core 88.5 2-Core 146 66% 107 Pts	4-Core 290 8-Core 414 44% 352 Pts	64-Core 430 27% 430 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 70% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 675M 994 User benchmarks, average bench 12% Sanyo(144D C0D0) 2GB CLim: 682 MHz, MLim: 825 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	14% Very poor	Lighting 16.4 Reflection 19.3 Parallax 14.7 13% 16.8 fps	MRender 22.3 Gravity 16.9 Splatting 17.5 15% 18.9 fps
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 14% Great: 14%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 750GB-$160 24,471 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 117GB free (System drive) Firmware: M0CR060 SusWrite @10s intervals: 316 135 165 284 264 290 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	74.5% Very good	Read 410 Write 302 Mixed 314 SusWrite 242 71% 317 MB/s	4K Read 20.1 4K Write 47.9 4K Mixed 28.3 92% 32.1 MB/s	DQ Read 342 DQ Write 313 DQ Mixed 285 226% 313 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 74.5% Great: 104%
Sandisk i100 8GB 268 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 6GB free Firmware: 11.56.04 SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 31 29 33 33 33 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	17.1% Very poor	Read 124 Write 32.7 Mixed 32.5 SusWrite 31.9 12% 55.2 MB/s	4K Read 15.7 4K Write 5.3 4K Mixed 6.4 35% 9.13 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 17.1% Great: 17%
HGST Travelstar 7K750 2.5" 750GB-$77 8,773 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 324GB free Firmware: JF4OA0D0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 107 107 107 107 107 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	53.1% Above average	Read 79.3 Write 91.2 Mixed 28.2 SusWrite 106 55% 76.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.3 68% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 53.1% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata AM1U16BC4P2-B19C 4x4GB 166 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	55% Above average	MC Read 21.1 MC Write 19.3 MC Mixed 16.7 54% 19 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 15.8 SC Mixed 17.5 47% 16.4 GB/s	Latency 70.8 56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 55% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 700G7C Builds (Compare 75 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 63%

Destroyer

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung 700G7C

CPU
Core i7-3630QMIntel $420Bench 61%, 65,927 samples	37x
Core i7-3610QMIntel $300Bench 62%, 38,575 samples	37x
Core i7-3720QMIntel $100Bench 65%, 9,911 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 675MNvidiaBench 12%, 994 samples	69x
Radeon HD 7800MAMDBench 9%, 500 samples	6x

SSD
PM830 128GBSamsungBench 61%, 13,767 samples	5x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $42Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	5x
840 Pro 256GBSamsung $190Bench 95%, 73,119 samples	3x

RAM
AM1U16BC4P2-B19C 4x4GBAdataBench 54%, 166 samples	19x
M471B5273DH0-CK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 52%, 981 samples	14x
M471B5273EB0-CK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 54%, 118 samples	10x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $420

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16