Asrock Z270 Gaming K4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 120%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics124% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock Z270 Gaming K4  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161205
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 30 '19 at 01:07
Run Duration241 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$242
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
94.3% Outstanding
Memory 97.4
1-Core 142
2-Core 286
97% 175 Pts
4-Core 491
8-Core 792
79% 642 Pts
64-Core 781
48% 781 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 94.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 417.71
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
124% Outstanding
Lighting 172
Reflection 190
Parallax 187
140% 183 fps
MRender 120
Gravity 168
Splatting 122
111% 137 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 124%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,883
Write 1,433
Mixed 727
297% 1,348 MB/s
4K Read 44.6
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 46.6
184% 66.3 MB/s
DQ Read 47.4
DQ Write 131
DQ Mixed 51.6
50% 76.8 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
172GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 415 365 487 489 494 493 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
127% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 488
Mixed 395
SusWrite 457
104% 461 MB/s
4K Read 47.2
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 63.8
216% 76.7 MB/s
DQ Read 326
DQ Write 180
DQ Mixed 65.8
99% 191 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 127%
Great: 134%
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116
139GB free
Firmware: MU02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 316 287 333 332 334 333 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
92.2% Outstanding
Read 441
Write 331
Mixed 292
SusWrite 322
78% 346 MB/s
4K Read 29.9
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 42.8
158% 60.3 MB/s
DQ Read 91.5
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 114
94% 131 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 97%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158
931GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1079 2394 1607 1164 1160 1168 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
280% Outstanding
Read 2508
Write 2,341
Mixed 1,626
SusWrite 1,429
443% 1,976 MB/s
4K Read 62.1
4K Write 151
4K Mixed 82.4
280% 98.6 MB/s
DQ Read 64.1
DQ Write 163
DQ Mixed 340
194% 189 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 280%
Great: 372%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$109
610GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 95 97 97 95 98 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
55.3% Above average
Read 97
Write 74.8
Mixed 76.3
SusWrite 95.5
64% 85.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
164% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GX-D4-3000-MR 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
98.7% Outstanding
MC Read 37.7
MC Write 38.2
MC Mixed 27.3
98% 34.4 GB/s
SC Read 22.3
SC Write 41.3
SC Mixed 31.3
90% 31.6 GB/s
Latency 48.8
82% 48.8 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 98.7%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z270 Gaming K4 Builds (Compare 532 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asrock Z270 Gaming K4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 109% - Outstanding Total price: $511
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback