Asrock X79 Extreme4-M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics31.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
MotherboardAsrock X79 Extreme4-M  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140429
Uptime4.9 Days
Run DateJan 29 '19 at 11:29
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3820
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
81.8% Excellent
Memory 94.9
1-Core 99.1
2-Core 194
76% 129 Pts
4-Core 379
8-Core 495
56% 437 Pts
64-Core 497
31% 497 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 11BF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.82
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
31.1% Below average
Lighting 38.6
Reflection 30.6
Parallax 37.1
32% 35.4 fps
MRender 38.8
Gravity 37.3
Splatting 36
30% 37.4 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
LSI Logical Volume 398GB
222GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 476 544 500 533 536 516 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 88% Great: 96%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
553GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 112 120 89 79 102 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
69.3% Good
Read 143
Write 124
Mixed 77.1
SusWrite 98.4
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
220% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 109%
WD WD7502AAEX-00Y9A0 750GB
500GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 69 65 78 89 83 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
45.5% Average
Read 83.8
Write 88.5
Mixed 66.2
SusWrite 74.2
58% 78.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
177% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 77%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31
581GB free
Firmware: MS2OA7L0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 117 95 105 90 85 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
66.9% Good
Read 131
Write 128
Mixed 40.2
SusWrite 102
73% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
131% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
97.7% Outstanding
MC Read 36.8
MC Write 40.7
MC Mixed 36.3
108% 37.9 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 13.3
SC Mixed 14.1
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 57.4
70% 57.4 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 97.7%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79 Extreme4-M Builds (Compare 84 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock X79 Extreme4-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $158
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback