Gigabyte Z370 Aorus Gaming 7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics80.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte Z370 Aorus Gaming 7  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180403
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateJan 28 '19 at 17:31
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
97.8% Outstanding
Memory 96.3
1-Core 140
2-Core 278
95% 171 Pts
4-Core 533
8-Core 881
86% 707 Pts
64-Core 1132
70% 1132 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 97.8%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.71
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
80.2% Excellent
Lighting 99.9
Reflection 108
Parallax 102
81% 103 fps
MRender 93.6
Gravity 94.3
Splatting 96.9
78% 94.9 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1842
Write 1,574
Mixed 536
290% 1,317 MB/s
4K Read 41.9
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 54.8
199% 73.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,050
DQ Write 759
DQ Mixed 751
603% 853 MB/s
Poor: 153% Great: 254%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
40GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 478 483 485 484 484 352 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 481
Mixed 413
SusWrite 461
105% 464 MB/s
4K Read 46.3
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 62.6
210% 73.5 MB/s
DQ Read 355
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 309
242% 333 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 129%
Great: 134%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
348GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 126 127 128 127 128 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
84% Excellent
Read 166
Write 127
Mixed 79.2
SusWrite 127
91% 125 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
220% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 84%
Great: 109%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$146
2TB free
Firmware: FP2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 160 159 152 160 156 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Read 137
Write 132
Mixed 66.8
SusWrite 156
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.1
238% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$43
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
98.9% Outstanding
MC Read 36.9
MC Write 38.1
MC Mixed 29
99% 34.7 GB/s
SC Read 22.1
SC Write 42.7
SC Mixed 30.4
91% 31.7 GB/s
Latency 52.9
76% 52.9 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 7 Builds (Compare 3,954 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 Aorus Gaming 7 - $221

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $1,049
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback