HP OMEN X by HP Laptop 17-ap0xx

Performance Results


Gaming 88% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 47% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	94.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	171% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).

Run History

12 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago.

System	HP OMEN X by HP Laptop 17-ap0xx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 83A5
Memory	27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180614
Uptime	4.4 Days
Run Date	Jan 28 '19 at 14:50
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	IND-User
Background CPU	29%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Extreme
Intel Core i7-7820HK 8,819 User benchmarks, average bench 67% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	64.2% Good	1-Core 101 2-Core 198 70% 149 Pts	4-Core 349 8-Core 339 47% 344 Pts	64-Core 455 30% 455 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 64.2% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080 (Mobile) 9,873 User benchmarks, average bench 85% HP(103C 83A5) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.35 Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	94.8% Outstanding	Lighting 358 Reflection 365 Parallax 370 94% 364 fps	MRender 222 Gravity 355 Splatting 234 95% 270 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 94.8% Great: 106%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$60 47,907 User benchmarks, average bench 189% 115GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXB73H1Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 436 293 292 292 293 278 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	171% Outstanding	Read 1,442 Write 1,043 Mixed 684 SusWrite 314 193% 871 MB/s	4K Read 47.4 4K Write 96 4K Mixed 61.3 201% 68.2 MB/s	DQ Read 767 DQ Write 665 DQ Mixed 712 535% 715 MB/s
Poor: 122% ↑ This bench: 171% Great: 248%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB 37,675 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 409GB free Firmware: RXM3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 131 131 130 127 120 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	60.5% Good	Read 82.8 Write 121 Mixed 64.2 SusWrite 128 73% 99 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.3 91% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 60.5% Great: 96%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata AX4S2800316G18-B 2x16GB 65 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 2 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	77.2% Very good	MC Read 27.9 MC Write 30.6 MC Mixed 25.7 80% 28.1 GB/s	SC Read 14.6 SC Write 28.7 SC Mixed 22.4 63% 21.9 GB/s	Latency 84 48% 84 ns
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 77.2% Great: 95%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical OMEN X by HP Laptop 17-ap0xx Builds (Compare 571 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.

Gaming 80%

Battleship

Desktop 83%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 55%

Yacht

System: HP OMEN X by HP Laptop 17-ap0xx

CPU
Core i7-7820HKIntelBench 67%, 8,819 samples	424x
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 61%, 292,771 samples	147x

GPU
GTX 1080 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 85%, 9,873 samples	444x
GTX 1070 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 68%, 49,559 samples	127x

SSD
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsung $60Bench 189%, 47,907 samples	212x
Raid 0 Volume 512GBIntelBench 194%, 9,992 samples	35x
Raid 0 Volume 1TBIntelBench 269%, 7,477 samples	32x

RAM
HP26D4S9S8MH-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 72%, 1,494 samples	127x
AX4S2800316G18-B 2x16GBAdataBench 82%, 65 samples	60x
AX4S2800316G18-B 1x16GBAdataBench 45%, 60 samples	59x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 36% - Below average

Total price: $60

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $205	Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240	Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9400F $150	Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $375	Nvidia RTX 2060 $349	Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $653	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14