Acer Aspire TC-865

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics99.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive95.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire TC-865  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire TC-865
Memory8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180508
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 27 '19 at 08:00
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$131
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
86.9% Excellent
Memory 89.9
1-Core 122
2-Core 242
85% 151 Pts
4-Core 452
8-Core 691
71% 571 Pts
64-Core 622
38% 622 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
Nvidia(10DE 119D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
99.3% Outstanding
Lighting 129
Reflection 135
Parallax 126
105% 130 fps
MRender 95.8
Gravity 122
Splatting 103
88% 107 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 99.3%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
276GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 352 320 318 320 319 320 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
95.6% Outstanding
Read 419
Write 449
Mixed 434
SusWrite 325
92% 407 MB/s
4K Read 33.4
4K Write 73.1
4K Mixed 43.9
146% 50.1 MB/s
DQ Read 357
DQ Write 252
DQ Mixed 327
238% 312 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 95.6%
Great: 129%
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB-$249
154GB free
Firmware: MN6OA5C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 92 91 92 94 92 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
50% Above average
Read 81.7
Write 92.2
Mixed 51
SusWrite 92.3
58% 79.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
156% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 50%
Great: 85%
WD easystore 25FB 8TB
3.5TB free, PID 25fb
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 167 163 162 164 165 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
75% Very good
Read 163
Write 164
Mixed 113
SusWrite 164
204% 151 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1.1
212% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 75%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$379
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68% Good
MC Read 26.4
MC Write 25.3
MC Mixed 20.7
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 23.5
SC Mixed 18.8
55% 19.2 GB/s
Latency 67.3
59% 67.3 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 68%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire TC-865 Builds (Compare 260 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire TC-865

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $211
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback