Asus P5KPL/1600

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P5KPL/1600  (all builds)
Memory0.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090316
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 25 '19 at 11:59
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 58%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5460-$190
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.15 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
28.1% Poor
Memory 30.9
1-Core 39.3
2-Core 84.6
29% 51.6 Pts
4-Core 142
8-Core 165
20% 154 Pts
64-Core 152
9% 152 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 560
Nvidia(10DE 034A) 128MB
Ram: 128MB, Driver: 259.12
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.38% Terrible
Lighting 0.7
Reflection 0.58
Parallax 0.12
1% 0.47 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.38%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD6400AACS-00G8B1 640GB
110GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 05.04C05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.5 0 19 17 18 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
5.98% Terrible
Read 8.5
Write 11
Mixed 31.5
SusWrite 12.1
12% 15.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.2
46% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 5.98%
Great: 49%
Samsung HD160JJ 160GB-$85
46GB free
Firmware: ZM100-33
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 14 26 24 24 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Read 19.3
Write 8.3
Mixed 13.5
SusWrite 20.8
12% 15.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.2
45% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 33%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
103GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 91 93 93 93 88 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
52% Above average
Read 89.5
Write 91.8
Mixed 66.3
SusWrite 91.5
63% 84.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
130% 1 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 52%
Great: 67%
Seagate Portable 500GB
89GB free, PID 2332
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 26 25 26 25 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
10.7% Very poor
Read 26.8
Write 21.8
Mixed 16.5
SusWrite 25.3
30% 22.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
29% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.7%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
9.87% Terrible
MC Read 3.1
MC Write 4.6
MC Mixed 3.3
10% 3.67 GB/s
SC Read 0.8
SC Write 1.3
SC Mixed 0.5
2% 0.87 GB/s
Latency 249
16% 249 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.87%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5KPL/1600 Builds (Compare 87 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5KPL/1600

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 33% - Below average Total price: $185
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback