Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 48% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	3.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	47.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME A320M-K (all builds)
Memory	3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180419
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 25 '19 at 10:44
Run Duration	152 Seconds
Run User	PHL-User
Background CPU	28%

PC Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 200GE-$57 12,631 User benchmarks, average bench 54% AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	46.1% Average	Memory 56.4 1-Core 80.7 2-Core 136 52% 91 Pts	4-Core 205 8-Core 226 28% 215 Pts	64-Core 138 8% 138 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 46.1% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX Vega 3 (Ryzen iGPU) 18,674 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 876B) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 18.12.2 Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	3.96% Terrible	Lighting 3.47 Reflection 4.58 Parallax 5.47 3% 4.5 fps	MRender 4.48 Gravity 4.8 Splatting 11.6 6% 6.95 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.96% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Team T2535T120G 120GB 1,793 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 73GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0412A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 348 374 130 44 41 43 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	47.9% Average	Read 381 Write 316 Mixed 165 SusWrite 164 57% 256 MB/s	4K Read 22.4 4K Write 25.3 4K Mixed 9.4 59% 19 MB/s	DQ Read 137 DQ Write 109 DQ Mixed 22.1 44% 89.2 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 47.9% Great: 86%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$90 108,153 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 257GB free Firmware: 01.03A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 58 56 58 58 56 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	31.7% Below average	Read 53.4 Write 53.9 Mixed 41.3 SusWrite 56.8 38% 51.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 154% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 31.7% Great: 58%
AI Mass Storage 32GB 1,216 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 5GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.7 6 7.7 7.8 8.1 8.7 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 25.4 Write 1.5 SusWrite 7.5 10% 11.5 MB/s	4K Read 3.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 13% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 10%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GB 46,352 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	35.8% Below average	MC Read 12.8 MC Write 12.9 MC Mixed 12.5 36% 12.7 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 10.8 SC Mixed 10.4 30% 10.4 GB/s	Latency 139 29% 139 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 35.8% Great: 47%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,051 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 29%

Raft

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $70

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	1,463x
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	1,307x
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples	1,007x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	949x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	735x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	654x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	716x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	340x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $42Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	284x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	293x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	226x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	204x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $357

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16