HP 500-205eo

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 51% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	10.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	HP 500-205eo (all builds)
Motherboard	MSI 2AE0
Memory	3.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140115
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Jan 24 '19 at 15:33
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	19%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-670K (2013 D.Ri) 403 User benchmarks, average bench 53% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	51.6% Above average	Memory 70.2 1-Core 67 2-Core 119 52% 85.4 Pts	4-Core 193 8-Core 193 26% 193 Pts	64-Core 186 12% 186 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 51.6% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 645 4,869 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Device(1B0A 90CC) 2GB CLim: 823 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 398.36 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	10.1% Very poor	Lighting 11.8 Reflection 10.7 Parallax 13.8 10% 12.1 fps	MRender 14.8 Gravity 13.7 Splatting 12.3 11% 13.6 fps
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 10.1% Great: 10%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 841GB free (System drive) Firmware: HP34 SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 36 41 52 45 62 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	23.5% Poor	Read 30.3 Write 39.2 Mixed 25.3 SusWrite 51.3 27% 36.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 107% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 23.5% Great: 114%
Seagate Expansion 2TB 49,966 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1.5TB free Firmware: 9300 SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 120 118 118 118 119 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	57.8% Above average	Read 82.7 Write 114 Mixed 63 SusWrite 119 69% 94.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.2 99% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 57.8% Great: 67%
WD Elements 1TB 51,914 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 186GB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 23 25 25 25 24 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	13.7% Very poor	Read 27.2 Write 23.2 Mixed 20.5 SusWrite 24.2 32% 23.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 70% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 13.7% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351U6EFR8C-PB HMT41GU6MFR8C-PB 12GB 83 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	26.3% Poor	MC Read 11.9 MC Write 5.3 MC Mixed 9.3 25% 8.83 GB/s	SC Read 6.7 SC Write 5.9 SC Mixed 8.8 20% 7.13 GB/s	Latency 101 40% 101 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 26.3% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 500-205eo Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: HP 500-205eo

CPU
FX-670K (2013 D.Ri)AMDBench 53%, 403 samples	9x

GPU
GeForce GTX 645NvidiaBench 9%, 4,869 samples	8x
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples	1x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	2x
BX500 480GBCrucial $38Bench 63%, 83,298 samples	1x

RAM
HP698651-154-KEB Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 12GBKingstonBench 30%, 6 samples	2x
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 12GBHynixBench 40%, 92 samples	2x
M378B5173DB0-CK0 Hynix HMT41GU6MFR8C-PB 12GBSamsungBench 38%, 74 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 13% - Very poor

Total price: $100

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16