| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 1.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | HP Z820 Workstation (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 158B |
| Memory | 29.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20121017 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 24 '19 at 13:26 |
| Run Duration | 148 Seconds |
| Run User | FRA-User |
| Background CPU | 10% |
PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 0
CPU0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
|
43.6%
Average
|
43% 76.5 Pts
|
42% 361 Pts
|
44% 713 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia Quadro 600
HP(103C 0835) 1GB
CLim: 640 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 369.9
|
1.12%
Terrible
|
0% 2.43 fps
|
3% 4.13 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD WD20EURS-63S48Y0 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 119 117 127 119 114 MB/s
|
68.8%
Good
|
68% 92.8 MB/s
|
147% 1.07 MB/s
| |
|
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 64GB-$23
23GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 21 19 21 21 20 MB/s
|
34.5%
Below average
|
84% 73.3 MB/s
|
203% 3.03 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M393B1K70DH0-CK0 4x8GB
4 of 16 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
44.2%
Average
|
50% 17.4 GB/s
|
20% 6.97 GB/s
|
21% 189 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Z820 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,749 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP Z820 Workstation
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 65%, 4,306 samples | 145x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples | 113x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 01stBench 71%, 1,646 samples | 87x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples | 145x |
| Quadro K5000NvidiaBench 21%, 3,775 samples | 139x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 65x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |