Asus ROG STRIX X399-E GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 86% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 104% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	99.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	96% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX X399-E GAMING (all builds)
Memory	25.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180103
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jan 24 '19 at 13:14
Run Duration	279 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225 23,641 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	81.2% Excellent	Memory 77.6 1-Core 117 2-Core 228 78% 141 Pts	4-Core 455 8-Core 909 80% 682 Pts	64-Core 2,333 144% 2,333 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 81.2% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Nvidia(10DE 1B06) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 411.70 Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	99.4% Outstanding	Lighting 116 Reflection 179 Parallax 169 94% 154 fps	MRender 120 Gravity 168 Splatting 118 109% 135 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 99.4% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 33GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 294 30 28 28 26 26 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	96% Outstanding	Read 502 Write 482 Mixed 300 SusWrite 71.9 76% 339 MB/s	4K Read 42.5 4K Write 95.5 4K Mixed 50.2 179% 62.7 MB/s	DQ Read 372 DQ Write 353 DQ Mixed 180 185% 302 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 96% Great: 108%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 30GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 384 196 150 144 139 135 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	98.6% Outstanding	Read 502 Write 487 Mixed 401 SusWrite 191 88% 395 MB/s	4K Read 44.7 4K Write 103 4K Mixed 52 189% 66.5 MB/s	DQ Read 276 DQ Write 108 DQ Mixed 156 125% 180 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 98.6% Great: 124%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 194GB free Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1817 863 574 573 573 572 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	237% Outstanding	Read 1,949 Write 1,729 Mixed 802 SusWrite 829 296% 1,327 MB/s	4K Read 40.4 4K Write 131 4K Mixed 58.3 206% 76.7 MB/s	DQ Read 1043 DQ Write 993 DQ Mixed 800 660% 945 MB/s
Poor: 153% ↑ This bench: 237% Great: 254%
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89 48,059 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 365GB free Firmware: 1AG01118 SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 98 100 101 99 101 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	54.9% Above average	Read 91 Write 45.3 Mixed 47.8 SusWrite 100 52% 71.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 54.9% Great: 59%
Samsung HD642JJ 640GB-$70 13,060 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 345GB free Firmware: 1AA01112 SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 100 104 107 106 107 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	60.6% Good	Read 106 Write 66.5 Mixed 60.5 SusWrite 105 62% 84.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1 194% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 60.6% Great: 63%
Samsung HD400LJ 400GB-$85 1,439 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 339GB free Firmware: ZZ100-14 SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 42 64 72 72 72 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	39.1% Below average	Read 71.7 Write 74 Mixed 46.5 SusWrite 64.3 47% 64.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.8 136% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 39.1% Great: 41%
H/W RAID 1 1TB 38GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 76 75 75 75 75 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	35.5% Below average	Read 85.3 Write 38 Mixed 57.7 SusWrite 75.5 83% 64.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1.1 112% 1.33 MB/s

H/W RAID 1 2TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 924GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 75 75 75 75 75 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	41.3% Average	Read 122 Write 44.3 Mixed 57.8 SusWrite 75.4 92% 74.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1 115% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 41.3% Great: 41%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x8GB 4,962 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	167% Outstanding	MC Read 66.7 MC Write 68 MC Mixed 63.8 189% 66.2 GB/s	SC Read 19.4 SC Write 43.6 SC Mixed 26.8 86% 29.9 GB/s	Latency 85.2 47% 85.2 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 167% Great: 144%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG STRIX X399-E GAMING Builds (Compare 349 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 122%

UFO

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 148%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X399-E GAMING

CPU
Ryzen TR 1950XAMD $225Bench 77%, 23,641 samples	104x
Ryzen TR 2950XAMD $798Bench 81%, 10,169 samples	83x
Ryzen TR 1920XAMD $800Bench 78%, 10,440 samples	60x

GPU
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	30x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	22x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	18x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	29x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	15x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	14x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	16x
F4 DDR4 3200 C16 8x8GBG.SKILLBench 125%, 648 samples	7x
CMR16GX4M2A2666C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 82%, 731 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 93% - Outstanding

Total price: $874

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16