PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 22.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 11.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
Memory | 24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | INTEL_ DX58SO__ |
Motherboard | Intel DX58SO (all builds) |
Memory | 17.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20130729 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | Jan 24 '19 at 12:51 |
Run Duration | 160 Seconds |
Run User | BEL-User |
Background CPU | 98% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
73.3%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 680-$360
Asus(1043 83F7) 2GB
CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 417.35
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
22.4%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 82 70 55 49 41 MB/s
|
11.5%
Very poor
|
|||
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
440GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 7.7 7.5 3.9 8.6 8.2 MB/s
|
20.7%
Poor
|
|||
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
676GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 76 64 53 54 57 MB/s
|
34.1%
Below average
|
|||
WD WD1500HLFS-01G6U1 150GB
52GB free
Firmware: 04.04V02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 68 63 52 54 55 MB/s
|
37.3%
Below average
|
|||
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
468GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 7.6 7.1 3.7 8.3 8 MB/s
|
3.38%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 3x8GB
3 of 4 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR3
|
56.4%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples | 12x |
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples | 10x |
Core i7 930Intel $249Bench 64%, 19,497 samples | 6x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 4x |
GeForce 9600 GTNvidiaBench 4%, 20,826 samples | 3x |
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 3x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 64% - Good | Total price: $495 |