Performance Results


Gaming 52% Yacht	Desktop 103% UFO	Workstation 50% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	42.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	121% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Gigabyte Z390 M GAMING
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z390 M GAMING-CF (all builds)
Memory	11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181204
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Jan 24 '19 at 10:52
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700K-$252 550,833 User benchmarks, average bench 97% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	Memory 96.8 1-Core 152 2-Core 302 101% 183 Pts	4-Core 602 8-Core 1,168 105% 885 Pts	64-Core 1,164 72% 1,164 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 105%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Zotac(19DA 0426) CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 2702 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.71 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	42.2% Average	Lighting 47.7 Reflection 55 Parallax 44.7 39% 49.2 fps	MRender 68.2 Gravity 47.7 Splatting 62.2 49% 59.4 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 42.2% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX Predator AHCI PCIe M.2 240GB-$141 6,458 User benchmarks, average bench 131% 38GB free (System drive) Firmware: OC34L5TA Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 465 344 325 328 230 308 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	121% Outstanding	Read 1,088 Write 629 Mixed 474 SusWrite 334 140% 631 MB/s	4K Read 36.5 4K Write 74.4 4K Mixed 38.5 144% 49.8 MB/s	DQ Read 367 DQ Write 216 DQ Mixed 93 122% 225 MB/s
Poor: 84% ↑ This bench: 121% Great: 159%
Sandisk PLUS 480GB 58,990 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 204GB free Firmware: UG4500RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 50 39 51 16 199 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	49% Average	Read 447 Write 242 Mixed 134 SusWrite 80.9 50% 226 MB/s	4K Read 22.2 4K Write 34.7 4K Mixed 16.8 74% 24.6 MB/s	DQ Read 116 DQ Write 64.6 DQ Mixed 22.5 35% 67.8 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 49% Great: 61%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 205GB free Firmware: EXM01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 453 463 465 470 470 477 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	112% Outstanding	Read 506 Write 469 Mixed 384 SusWrite 466 103% 456 MB/s	4K Read 34.7 4K Write 79.4 4K Mixed 45.6 153% 53.2 MB/s	DQ Read 376 DQ Write 330 DQ Mixed 345 261% 350 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 124%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 4x4GB 2,268 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	105% Outstanding	MC Read 38.3 MC Write 41.5 MC Mixed 32.3 107% 37.4 GB/s	SC Read 22.5 SC Write 43.3 SC Mixed 31 92% 32.3 GB/s	Latency 51.1 78% 51.1 ns
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 115%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 88%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 99%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 74%

Battleship

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	113x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	108x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	100x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	107x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	72x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	63x

Value: 92% - Outstanding

Total price: $614

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16