PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 45.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Dell Precision T3600 |
Motherboard | Dell Precision T3600 (all builds) |
Memory | 14 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit kolorów |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180621 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jan 24 '19 at 08:57 |
Run Duration | 175 Seconds |
Run User | POL-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-1603 0
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
|
64.5%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 780-Ti-$410
Asus(1043 8495) 3GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 397.93
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
45.9%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Raid 0 Volume 950GB
606GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 204 205 208 208 207 MB/s
|
122%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate ST3250312AS 250GB-$32
109GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 118 118 119 121 119 MB/s
|
71.2%
Very good
|
|||
Seagate ST3250312AS 250GB-$32
38GB free
Firmware: JC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 75 77 77 77 77 MB/s
|
46.5%
Average
|
|||
Seagate ST3500320NS 500GB-$100
227GB free
Firmware: SN05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 85 84 85 85 85 MB/s
|
45.3%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Micron-002C 72JSZS2G72PZ-1G1D1 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
|
23.4%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon E5-1620 0Intel $345Bench 70%, 17,464 samples | 1,061x |
Xeon E5-1650 0Intel $230Bench 73%, 10,189 samples | 444x |
Xeon E5-1603 0IntelBench 60%, 3,589 samples | 237x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples | 162x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 137x |
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples | 117x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $373 |