Asrock A320M-DGS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics16.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock A320M-DGS  (all builds)
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1280 x 720 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181219
Uptime2 Days
Run DateJan 24 '19 at 08:40
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon X4 950 Quad Core
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
46.1% Average
Memory 67.8
1-Core 70.3
2-Core 126
53% 88.1 Pts
4-Core 135
8-Core 193
20% 164 Pts
64-Core 204
13% 204 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Nvidia(10DE 1D01) 2GB
CLim: 2113 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 417.71
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
16.8% Very poor
Lighting 20.5
Reflection 16.5
Parallax 19.5
17% 18.8 fps
MRender 19
Gravity 20.4
Splatting 21.9
17% 20.4 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS120G2G0B-00EPW0 120GB
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UI450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 15 28 102 61 83 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
34.7% Below average
Read 319
Write 248
Mixed 5.3
SusWrite 85.1
36% 164 MB/s
4K Read 15.3
4K Write 21.1
4K Mixed 14.5
53% 17 MB/s
DQ Read 18
DQ Write 1.5
DQ Mixed 1.1
3% 6.87 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 52%
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$30
342GB free
Firmware: 0001LVM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 86 84 86 89 89 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
50.4% Above average
Read 88.9
Write 86
Mixed 53.6
SusWrite 86.9
58% 78.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
100% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 61%
QUMO SPEEDSTER 3.0 32GB
29GB free, PID 5200
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
25.5% Poor
Read 121
Write 50.6
Mixed 23.7
SusWrite 19.9
58% 53.8 MB/s
4K Read 7.2
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 2
115% 3.27 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 25.5%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown< CT4G4DFS824A.M8FE 859< CT4G4DFS824A.C8FADP 8GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33.6% Below average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 8.3
MC Mixed 14.1
35% 12.2 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 4.9
SC Mixed 9.6
20% 6.97 GB/s
Latency 107
38% 107 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-DGS Builds (Compare 450 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-DGS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $187
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $183Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback