Acer Predator G9-792

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics47.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive160% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAcer Predator G9-792  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Challenger_SLS
Memory56.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171108
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 23 '19 at 20:55
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
66.3% Good
Memory 71.7
1-Core 102
2-Core 189
68% 121 Pts
4-Core 334
8-Core 442
49% 388 Pts
64-Core 376
23% 376 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980M
Acer(1025 107D) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 24.21.13.9836
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
47.1% Average
Lighting 53.2
Reflection 55.6
Parallax 53.7
43% 54.2 fps
MRender 88
Gravity 74
Splatting 46.2
54% 69.4 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$69
122GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXW7300Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 974 997 889 799 551 510 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
160% Outstanding
Read 1,502
Write 1,248
Mixed 826
SusWrite 786
244% 1,091 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 58.1
4K Mixed 40.1
131% 43.5 MB/s
DQ Read 275
DQ Write 221
DQ Mixed 267
194% 254 MB/s
Poor: 136%
This bench: 160%
Great: 262%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB
2TB free, PID 25e2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 87 88 87 87 88 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
34.6% Below average
Read 87.7
Write 71.4
Mixed 58.2
SusWrite 86.8
102% 76 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.2
40% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 59%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 124GB
94GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 15 15 18 53 27 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
28.8% Poor
Read 127
Write 66.4
Mixed 65.2
SusWrite 29.2
86% 72.1 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 1.8
108% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GS6MFR8N-TF 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67.3% Good
MC Read 24.4
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 22.6
70% 24.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 22.9
SC Mixed 20.2
53% 18.4 GB/s
Latency 97.5
41% 97.5 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator G9-792 Builds (Compare 103 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator G9-792

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback