Asus P8H77-V

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 60% Gunboat	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 48% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	80.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8H77-V (all builds)
Memory	11 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141027
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jan 23 '19 at 20:27
Run Duration	138 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	76.9% Very good	Memory 88.8 1-Core 105 2-Core 212 78% 135 Pts	4-Core 352 8-Core 509 54% 431 Pts	64-Core 500 31% 500 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 76.9% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Zotac(19DA 1445) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.71 Performing below potential (58^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	80.3% Excellent	Lighting 99.2 Reflection 110 Parallax 102 81% 104 fps	MRender 96.8 Gravity 93.5 Splatting 98.9 79% 96.4 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 80.3% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 830 128GB-$109 37,250 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 10GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXM03B1Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 364 Write 182 Mixed 157 51% 234 MB/s	4K Read 19.1 4K Write 35.4 4K Mixed 18.2 71% 24.2 MB/s	DQ Read 22.9 DQ Write 41.9 DQ Mixed 21.8 20% 28.9 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 76%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$33 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 21GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 134 108 103 113 120 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	75.9% Very good	Read 146 Write 146 Mixed 78.5 SusWrite 119 90% 122 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.9 156% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 75.9% Great: 112%
Multiple Card Reader 2GB 694 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 1GB free, PID 6366 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.9 6 6 6.1 6.1 5.9 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	4.93% Terrible	Read 18.3 Write 5.2 Mixed 5.3 SusWrite 6 10% 8.7 MB/s	4K Read 4.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 15% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.93% Great: 12%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CML8GX3M2A1600C9 029E CML8GX3M2A1600C9 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 16GB 150 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	47.7% Average	MC Read 16.4 MC Write 16.5 MC Mixed 14.7 45% 15.9 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 17.3 SC Mixed 16.1 45% 15.9 GB/s	Latency 68.7 58% 68.7 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 47.7% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8H77-V Builds (Compare 988 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 20%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8H77-V - $110

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	228x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	89x
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	86x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	86x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	66x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	54x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	32x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	28x
TOSHIBA-TR200 240GBBench 71%, 36,832 samples	25x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	26x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	22x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $566

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16