Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 37% Jet ski	Desktop 102% UFO	Workstation 36% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	28.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	267% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180921
Uptime	7.3 Days
Run Date	Jan 23 '19 at 16:22
Run Duration	173 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700K-$252 550,833 User benchmarks, average bench 97% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	98.2% Outstanding	Memory 96.1 1-Core 136 2-Core 271 94% 168 Pts	4-Core 537 8-Core 1,053 94% 795 Pts	64-Core 1,060 66% 1,060 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 98.2% Great: 105%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7870-$203 42,130 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Sapphire(174B E241) 2GB CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1200 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.12.3 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	28.3% Poor	Lighting 35.7 Reflection 32.4 Parallax 42.9 29% 37 fps	MRender 28.1 Gravity 31.2 Splatting 36.6 27% 32 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 28.3% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 299GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2058 729 573 584 575 595 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	267% Outstanding	Read 2,348 Write 2,166 Mixed 1,436 SusWrite 852 380% 1,701 MB/s	4K Read 58.3 4K Write 124 4K Mixed 75.9 251% 86 MB/s	DQ Read 1,106 DQ Write 834 DQ Mixed 947 714% 962 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 267% Great: 340%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 17GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 467 Write 450 Mixed 377 96% 432 MB/s	4K Read 41.7 4K Write 92.9 4K Mixed 55.2 183% 63.3 MB/s	DQ Read 376 DQ Write 338 DQ Mixed 356 267% 356 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
WD VelociRaptor 300GB-$90 11,249 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 36GB free Firmware: 04.04V01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 91 93 95 96 96 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	57.8% Above average	Read 107 Write 108 Mixed 72.8 SusWrite 94.2 70% 95.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1.2 223% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 57.8% Great: 69%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 523GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 75 78 78 77 79 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	42.1% Average	Read 69.7 Write 66.8 Mixed 58 SusWrite 76.6 50% 67.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 150% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 42.1% Great: 67%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$50 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 296GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 89 88 90 91 90 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	53.5% Above average	Read 96.8 Write 85.3 Mixed 60.2 SusWrite 89.3 61% 82.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 178% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 53.5% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB 92,468 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	MC Read 39.8 MC Write 41.1 MC Mixed 32.2 108% 37.7 GB/s	SC Read 21.2 SC Write 43.4 SC Mixed 28.8 89% 31.1 GB/s	Latency 53.5 75% 53.5 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 114%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 3,285 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 114%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 105%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	881x
Core i5-9600KIntel $155Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	546x
Core i9-9900KIntel $410Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	471x

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	284x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	243x
RTX 2060S (Super)Nvidia $510Bench 100%, 319,148 samples	203x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	149x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	133x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	88x

RAM
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	131x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	108x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	74x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 114% - Outstanding

Total price: $557

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16