PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 18.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING (all builds) |
Memory | 3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180122 |
Uptime | 0.8 Days |
Run Date | Jan 23 '19 at 16:19 |
Run Duration | 207 Seconds |
Run User | CHE-User |
Background CPU | 37% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
59.9%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Gigabyte(1458 354E) 2GB
CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 417.71
|
18.3%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
406GB free
Firmware: M0CR070
SusWrite @10s intervals: 418 385 306 246 246 252 MB/s
|
79.2%
Very good
|
|||
WD Purple Surveillance 1TB (2017)-$45
829GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 13 23 31 60 MB/s
|
10.1%
Very poor
|
|||
General UDisk 4GB
2GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.5 3.9 4.5 4.5 4.4 4.2 MB/s
|
4.66%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x4GB-$40
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
52.7%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples | 129x |
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples | 115x |
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples | 96x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 94x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 68x |
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 59x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 68% - Good | Total price: $745 |