Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	6.52% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	57.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1225 V2-$200 2,869 User benchmarks, average bench 70% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	72.6% Very good	Memory 85.5 1-Core 89.2 2-Core 178 69% 118 Pts	4-Core 347 8-Core 339 46% 343 Pts	64-Core 342 21% 342 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 72.6% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 2000 15,855 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Nvidia(10DE 084A) 1GB CLim: 625 MHz, MLim: 652 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 353.62 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	6.52% Terrible	Lighting 7.6 Reflection 8.73 Parallax 6.34 6% 7.56 fps	MRender 9.9 Gravity 8.03 Splatting 8.43 7% 8.79 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.52% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PH6-CE120-G 120GB 664 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 56GB free (System drive) Firmware: F/W:1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 90 75 62 69 40 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	57.7% Above average	Read 460 Write 242 Mixed 269 SusWrite 76.8 58% 262 MB/s	4K Read 5.7 4K Write 45.4 4K Mixed 26.7 67% 25.9 MB/s	DQ Read 245 DQ Write 325 DQ Mixed 195 172% 255 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 57.7% Great: 84%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA632 1TB-$109 12,285 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 187GB free Firmware: JP4OA41A SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.1 10 16 21 25 29 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 30% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT451U6AFR8C-PB 4x4GB 3,905 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	57.6% Above average	MC Read 21.3 MC Write 21.7 MC Mixed 17.6 58% 20.2 GB/s	SC Read 16.8 SC Write 15.5 SC Mixed 17.7 48% 16.7 GB/s	Latency 71.6 56% 71.6 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 57.6% Great: 82%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

RAM
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 4x4GBHynixBench 58%, 7,298 samples	51x
M378B5273DH0-CK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 57%, 2,354 samples	21x
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 53%, 17,809 samples	21x

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $384

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16