Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	16.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	51.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3 (all builds)
Memory	5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110916
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 23 '19 at 15:44
Run Duration	138 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144 43,442 User benchmarks, average bench 53% Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	59.7% Above average	Memory 86.9 1-Core 50.6 2-Core 101 52% 79.6 Pts	4-Core 189 8-Core 202 26% 196 Pts	64-Core 203 13% 203 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 59.7% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560-$180 23,273 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Gigabyte(1458 352A) 1GB CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	16.7% Very poor	Lighting 19.2 Reflection 22.3 Parallax 19.7 16% 20.4 fps	MRender 26.8 Gravity 19.6 Splatting 22.5 19% 23 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 16.7% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 830 128GB-$109 37,250 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 41GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXM03B1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 185 223 229 195 186 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	51.6% Above average	Read 311 Write 227 Mixed 150 SusWrite 196 49% 221 MB/s	4K Read 21.5 4K Write 45 4K Mixed 20.9 83% 29.1 MB/s	DQ Read 23.8 DQ Write 59.5 DQ Mixed 22.8 23% 35.4 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 51.6% Great: 76%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83 138,859 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 426GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 85 84 85 85 85 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	58.1% Above average	Read 118 Write 39.4 Mixed 71.4 SusWrite 84.2 58% 78.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.3 232% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 58.1% Great: 75%
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44 40,147 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 275GB free Firmware: 1AC01113 SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 85 84 85 85 85 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	56.3% Above average	Read 112 Write 59.6 Mixed 61.8 SusWrite 84.2 58% 79.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 188% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 56.3% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	34.5% Below average	MC Read 15 MC Write 7.7 MC Mixed 12.6 34% 11.8 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 6.4 SC Mixed 9.9 22% 7.83 GB/s	Latency 70.5 57% 70.5 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 34.5% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-990FXA-UD3 Builds (Compare 1,400 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3 - $100

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	570x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	210x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	110x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	74x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	66x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	61x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	46x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	39x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	35x

RAM
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	106x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	85x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	82x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $440

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16