ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP Hp Pavilion Gaming Desktop 690-0013W

Performance Results


Gaming 34% Sail boat	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 30% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	30.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	87.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	HP Hp Pavilion Gaming Desktop 690-0013W (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8433
Memory	11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181026
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 23 '19 at 15:30
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G-$135 127,344 User benchmarks, average bench 63% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	82.9% Excellent	Memory 82.6 1-Core 118 2-Core 237 81% 146 Pts	4-Core 448 8-Core 651 69% 549 Pts	64-Core 649 40% 649 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 82.9% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% HP(103C 8338) 2GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 1997 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 417.71 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	30.1% Below average	Lighting 36.6 Reflection 28.3 Parallax 34.5 30% 33.1 fps	MRender 43.8 Gravity 34.9 Splatting 35.3 31% 38 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 30.1% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDBNCE5000PNC-WRSN 500GB 3,847 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 187GB free (System drive) Firmware: X41110WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 390 299 304 292 297 297 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	87.5% Excellent	Read 485 Write 446 Mixed 346 SusWrite 313 89% 397 MB/s	4K Read 29.3 4K Write 65.1 4K Mixed 36.5 126% 43.6 MB/s	DQ Read 238 DQ Write 213 DQ Mixed 208 161% 220 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 87.5% Great: 106%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 326GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 167 173 174 174 175 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 181 Write 162 Mixed 108 SusWrite 172 114% 156 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 1.1 224% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 109%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 16GB 7,719 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 15GB free, PID a81d Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2 17 17 11 16 17 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	7% Terrible	Read 23.1 Write 7.8 Mixed 7 SusWrite 13.5 15% 12.9 MB/s	4K Read 3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 11% 1 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 7% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 2x8GB 25,824 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	MC Read 36.2 MC Write 39.1 MC Mixed 33.4 104% 36.2 GB/s	SC Read 24.8 SC Write 42.5 SC Mixed 27.5 90% 31.6 GB/s	Latency 75.8 53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 88%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback