Acer Predator G3620

Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 15% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	21.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Acer Predator G3620 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer Predator G3620
Memory	1.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120808
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 23 '19 at 15:16
Run Duration	261 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	44%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	62.4% Good	Memory 80.1 1-Core 88.8 2-Core 170 66% 113 Pts	4-Core 242 8-Core 441 41% 342 Pts	64-Core 435 27% 435 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 62.4% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% PNY(196E 119F) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 417.71 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	21.7% Poor	Lighting 7.03 Reflection 40.7 Parallax 0 6% 15.9 fps	MRender 70.2 Gravity 68.7 Splatting 56.9 53% 65.3 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 21.7% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42 87,912 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 30GB free Firmware: U21010RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 328 328 344 340 322 313 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	62.6% Good	Read 316 Write 291 Mixed 209 SusWrite 329 64% 286 MB/s	4K Read 16.9 4K Write 45.4 4K Mixed 12.2 65% 24.8 MB/s	DQ Read 180 DQ Write 301 DQ Mixed 107 119% 196 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 62.6% Great: 78%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$72 71,106 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 73 48 66 63 71 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	33.4% Below average	Read 54.8 Write 49 Mixed 46.3 SusWrite 61 39% 52.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 187% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 33.4% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 2x4GB 7,511 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	47.8% Average	MC Read 18 MC Write 17.5 MC Mixed 15.9 49% 17.1 GB/s	SC Read 10.9 SC Write 11.6 SC Mixed 11.7 32% 11.4 GB/s	Latency 80.3 50% 80.3 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 47.8% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Predator G3620 Builds (Compare 386 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 17%

Surfboard

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 15%

Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator G3620

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	257x
Core i5-3350PIntel $60Bench 65%, 21,413 samples	55x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	29x

GPU
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples	48x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	34x
GeForce GT 640NvidiaBench 6%, 34,519 samples	29x

SSD
MX500 500GBCrucial $46Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	15x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	14x
LCT-128M3S 128GBLiteonitBench 67%, 2,346 samples	14x

RAM
ACR512X64D3U16C11G 3x4GBKingstonBench 41%, 216 samples	24x
HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 7,511 samples	20x
NT4GC64B8HG0NF-CG 2x4GBNanyaBench 47%, 2,338 samples	15x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 52% - Above average

Total price: $513

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16