Lenovo 80LF

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 25% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	34.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago.

System	Lenovo 80LF (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO Lenovo B41-30
Memory	5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151216
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 23 '16 at 12:42
Run Duration	111 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	68%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3050 14,457 User benchmarks, average bench 19% CHV, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	22.6% Poor	Memory 38.3 1-Core 20.9 2-Core 42.8 22% 34 Pts	4-Core 41.5 8-Core 42.6 6% 42 Pts	64-Core 42.5 3% 42.5 Pts
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 22.6% Great: 27%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 60,712 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Legend(17AA 3901) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4300 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.71% Terrible	Lighting 1.7 Reflection 2.73 Parallax 2.31 1% 2.25 fps	MRender 2.67 Gravity 1.7 Splatting 3.83 2% 2.73 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.71% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89 105,079 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 166GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3FD6SD Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 1 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 3 (64) Unknown 100 100 38560 (65) Unknown 100 100 51648 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 7 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 11 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 1236 (B7) Unknown 100 100 1 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 23 100 120260001815 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 1 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 1 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 100 100 63 (EA) Unknown 100 100 58 (F1) Unknown 100 100 60 (F2) Unknown 100 100 4 (FA) Read error retry rate 100 100 1	34.6% Below average	Read 369 Write 181 Mixed 142 50% 231 MB/s	4K Read 10.7 4K Write 13.9 4K Mixed 3.97 29% 9.53 MB/s	DQ Read 12.7 DQ Write 14.1 DQ Mixed 10.4 9% 12.4 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 34.6% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905417-062.A00G 2x4GB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	16.2% Very poor	MC Read 4.3 MC Write 8.9 MC Mixed 4.9 17% 6.03 GB/s	SC Read 1.2 SC Write 3.8 SC Mixed 2.6 7% 2.53 GB/s	Latency 210 19% 210 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 16.2% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 80LF Builds (Compare 19 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 22%

Surfboard

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80LF

CPU
Celeron N3050IntelBench 19%, 14,457 samples	14x
Pentium N3700IntelBench 26%, 11,299 samples	5x

GPU
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 60,712 samples	19x

SSD
SSD Plus 120GBSanDisk $42Bench 58%, 87,912 samples	1x
SSD 240GBGigabyte $30Bench 73%, 20,238 samples	1x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $36Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	1x

RAM
RMT3170MN68F9F1600 1x4GBRAMAXELBench 25%, 10,170 samples	3x
8KTF51264HZ-1G6E1 1x4GBMicronBench 25%, 14,353 samples	2x
HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 25%, 19,285 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 8% - Terrible

Total price: $42

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16