Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 R2

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 32% Sail boat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	29.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (61%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 R2 (all builds)
Memory	5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171108
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 22 '19 at 22:22
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	DOM-User
Background CPU	61%

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8150-$770 22,181 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	36% Below average	Memory 29.9 1-Core 60.6 2-Core 118 37% 69.6 Pts	4-Core 226 8-Core 346 35% 286 Pts	64-Core 367 23% 367 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 36% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon 3000 Graphics 21,841 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Gigabyte(1458 D000) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	0.38% Terrible	Lighting 0.37 Reflection 0.88 Parallax 0.16 0% 0.47 fps	MRender 0.62 Gravity 0.37 Splatting 0.91 0% 0.63 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.38% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 184GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1D2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 53 44 51 53 53 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	29.1% Poor	Read 170 Write 110 Mixed 113 SusWrite 49.5 25% 111 MB/s	4K Read 18.6 4K Write 26.6 4K Mixed 14.2 60% 19.8 MB/s	DQ Read 17.4 DQ Write 30.1 DQ Mixed 21 17% 22.8 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 29.1% Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 922GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 172 165 168 158 160 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	98.4% Outstanding	Read 179 Write 163 Mixed 74 SusWrite 164 106% 145 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 154% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 98.4% Great: 113%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139 139,542 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 144GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 55 55 55 54 55 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	41.4% Average	Read 90.3 Write 82.7 Mixed 46 SusWrite 53.7 50% 68.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 139% 1 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 41.4% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	11.3% Very poor	MC Read 3.4 MC Write 3.7 MC Mixed 4.3 11% 3.8 GB/s	SC Read 2.6 SC Write 3.3 SC Mixed 4 9% 3.3 GB/s	Latency 255 16% 255 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 11.3% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-78LMT-USB3 R2 Builds (Compare 915 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 R2

CPU
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	372x
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	273x
FX-8300AMD $168Bench 58%, 49,767 samples	76x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	132x
Radeon RX 560-BAMDBench 20%, 49,289 samples	56x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	43x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	31x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	25x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	16x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	281x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	117x
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	87x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $134

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16