Gigabyte GA-880GA-UD3H

Performance Results


Gaming 51% Yacht	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 37% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	85.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	72.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-880GA-UD3H (all builds)
Memory	8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20101008
Uptime	8.7 Days
Run Date	Jan 22 '19 at 20:13
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	39%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144 43,442 User benchmarks, average bench 53% Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	59.4% Above average	Memory 85.2 1-Core 49.1 2-Core 100 51% 78.2 Pts	4-Core 198 8-Core 194 26% 196 Pts	64-Core 192 12% 192 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 59.4% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% EVGA(3842 5173) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 391.1 Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	85.2% Excellent	Lighting 106 Reflection 115 Parallax 98.4 86% 106 fps	MRender 98.3 Gravity 99.4 Splatting 105 83% 101 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 85.2% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 24GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 241 283 103 87 75 76 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	72.2% Very good	Read 380 Write 367 Mixed 298 SusWrite 144 67% 297 MB/s	4K Read 35.5 4K Write 65.8 4K Mixed 43.3 144% 48.2 MB/s	DQ Read 42.6 DQ Write 101 DQ Mixed 57.1 48% 66.8 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 72.2% Great: 134%
Hitachi HDT725032VLA360 320GB 4,752 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 151GB free Firmware: V54OA7EA SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 54 55 55 55 55 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	31.7% Below average	Read 55.5 Write 53 Mixed 36.5 SusWrite 54.6 37% 49.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 31.7% Great: 40%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$40 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 516GB free Firmware: 05.00K05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 91 93 93 93 92 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	52.8% Above average	Read 91.5 Write 86 Mixed 65.7 SusWrite 92 62% 83.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 52.8% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x4GB 106,178 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	33.4% Below average	MC Read 14.3 MC Write 7.5 MC Mixed 12.5 33% 11.4 GB/s	SC Read 6.6 SC Write 6.3 SC Mixed 8.8 21% 7.23 GB/s	Latency 71.8 56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 33.4% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-880GA-UD3H Builds (Compare 107 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 14%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-880GA-UD3H

CPU
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples	21x
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples	15x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	14x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	7x
Radeon HD 4250ATIBench 1%, 5,806 samples	7x
HD 5770AMDBench 10%, 37,602 samples	5x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	5x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	4x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	4x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	21x
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	20x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $180

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16