PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor. |
Graphics | 28.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 34.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus A8R-MVP (all builds) |
Memory | 1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.4 GHz |
Display | 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit cores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20081209 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jan 22 '19 at 18:04 |
Run Duration | 193 Seconds |
Run User | PRT-User |
Background CPU | 100% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4200+
Socket 939, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.25 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
|
28.2%
Poor
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
28.4%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
451GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 54 64 65 60 64 MB/s
|
34.7%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC9F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 67 82 76 77 82 MB/s
|
58.3%
Above average
|
|||
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7
10GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.2 3.5 5 4.5 5.5 8.1 MB/s
|
3.09%
Terrible
|
|||
WD Elements 2TB
857GB free, PID 10b8
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 17 18 17 16 15 MB/s
|
8.98%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 4x1GB
4 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR
|
10.4%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds