Asus TUF Z270 MARK 1

Performance Results


Gaming 76% Battleship	Desktop 98% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 67% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	80.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	315% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (70%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z270 MARK 1 (all builds)
Memory	28.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180314
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 22 '19 at 18:02
Run Duration	244 Seconds
Run User	IND-User
Background CPU	70%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$250 712,312 User benchmarks, average bench 84% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	88.5% Excellent	Memory 94.2 1-Core 143 2-Core 243 91% 160 Pts	4-Core 446 8-Core 727 72% 587 Pts	64-Core 778 48% 778 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 88.5% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% EVGA(3842 5173) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.35 Performing below potential (58^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	80.2% Excellent	Lighting 98.6 Reflection 112 Parallax 105 80% 105 fps	MRender 97.2 Gravity 95 Splatting 99.6 80% 97.3 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 80.2% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 291GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2087 723 607 606 610 611 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	315% Outstanding	Read 2,540 Write 2384 Mixed 1,662 SusWrite 874 417% 1,865 MB/s	4K Read 69.4 4K Write 171 4K Mixed 93.3 315% 111 MB/s	DQ Read 1,514 DQ Write 1,303 DQ Mixed 1,366 1,035% 1,395 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 315% Great: 340%
Intel 750 Series NVMe PCIe 400GB-$550 8,641 User benchmarks, average bench 186% 167GB free Firmware: 8EV10171 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 924 923 937 926 926 927 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	232% Outstanding	Read 1,084 Write 943 Mixed 633 SusWrite 927 201% 897 MB/s	4K Read 43.5 4K Write 234 4K Mixed 54 259% 110 MB/s	DQ Read 1,524 DQ Write 943 DQ Mixed 1,052 833% 1,173 MB/s
Poor: 123% ↑ This bench: 232% Great: 230%
WD Black 5TB (2015)-$71 7,245 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 4.5TB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 160 172 168 166 167 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 184 Write 216 Mixed 103 SusWrite 168 123% 168 MB/s	4K Read 4.7 4K Write 3.5 4K Mixed 1.1 383% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 107%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB 2,304 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 282GB free, PID 0210 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 70 70 70 70 70 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	30.6% Below average	Read 73.3 Write 73.3 Mixed 31 SusWrite 69.9 82% 61.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.5 70% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 30.6% Great: 49%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB 9,084 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 575GB free, PID a202 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 98 100 100 99 99 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	40.5% Average	Read 87 Write 87.7 Mixed 36.8 SusWrite 99.3 104% 77.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 40.5% Great: 49%
SanDisk Ultra 64GB 2,296 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 57GB free, PID 558a Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 18 13 11 13 14 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	16.2% Very poor	Read 39 Write 19.3 Mixed 20.5 SusWrite 15.4 29% 23.6 MB/s	4K Read 5.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 3 188% 3.53 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 16.2% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4-2400C15-8GVR F4-3000C16-8GTZR F4-2400C15-8GVR F4-3000C16-8GTZR 32GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	82.1% Excellent	MC Read 29.7 MC Write 31.4 MC Mixed 24.9 82% 28.7 GB/s	SC Read 19.9 SC Write 34.2 SC Mixed 24.4 75% 26.2 GB/s	Latency 59.3 67% 59.3 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 82.1% Great: 86%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 801 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 90%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 77%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 1 - $131

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $250Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	476x
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	78x
Core i5-7600KIntel $190Bench 76%, 195,006 samples	75x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	90x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	84x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	74x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $76Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	35x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	25x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	25x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	30x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	21x
Vengeance LED DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $161Bench 85%, 35,811 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 82% - Excellent

Total price: $900

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16