Asus TUF Z270 MARK 1

Performance Results


Gaming 73% Battleship	Desktop 97% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 65% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	80.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	314% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z270 MARK 1 (all builds)
Memory	28.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180314
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 22 '19 at 17:44
Run Duration	244 Seconds
Run User	IND-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230 712,312 User benchmarks, average bench 84% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	85.9% Excellent	Memory 92 1-Core 131 2-Core 284 92% 169 Pts	4-Core 430 8-Core 731 70% 581 Pts	64-Core 782 48% 782 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 85.9% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% EVGA(3842 5173) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.35 Performing below potential (58^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	80.2% Excellent	Lighting 98.6 Reflection 112 Parallax 104 80% 105 fps	MRender 97.3 Gravity 94.7 Splatting 99.2 80% 97.1 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 80.2% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 291GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2113 704 610 600 610 608 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	314% Outstanding	Read 2,530 Write 2,391 Mixed 1,670 SusWrite 874 417% 1,866 MB/s	4K Read 70.3 4K Write 171 4K Mixed 91.2 314% 111 MB/s	DQ Read 1,507 DQ Write 1289 DQ Mixed 1,360 1,029% 1,385 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 314% Great: 340%
Intel 750 Series NVMe PCIe 400GB-$550 8,641 User benchmarks, average bench 186% 167GB free Firmware: 8EV10171 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 928 925 934 932 930 931 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	235% Outstanding	Read 1,129 Write 947 Mixed 742 SusWrite 930 210% 937 MB/s	4K Read 43.3 4K Write 237 4K Mixed 54.6 261% 112 MB/s	DQ Read 1,530 DQ Write 942 DQ Mixed 1054 834% 1,175 MB/s
Poor: 123% ↑ This bench: 235% Great: 230%
WD Black 5TB (2015)-$71 7,245 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 4.5TB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 166 167 167 167 166 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 185 Write 219 Mixed 101 SusWrite 168 123% 168 MB/s	4K Read 6.1 4K Write 3.3 4K Mixed 1.1 438% 3.5 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 107%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB 2,304 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 282GB free, PID 0210 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 70 70 70 70 70 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	30.3% Below average	Read 73.2 Write 73.2 Mixed 30 SusWrite 69.9 82% 61.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.5 66% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 30.3% Great: 49%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB 9,084 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 575GB free, PID a202 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 99 100 99 99 98 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	40% Below average	Read 85.2 Write 86.7 Mixed 35.8 SusWrite 99.4 103% 76.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 40% Great: 49%
SanDisk Ultra 64GB 2,296 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 57GB free, PID 558a Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 16 14 14 11 13 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	16.3% Very poor	Read 35.5 Write 21.2 Mixed 23.8 SusWrite 15.1 30% 23.9 MB/s	4K Read 6.1 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 2.7 186% 3.63 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 16.3% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4-2400C15-8GVR F4-3000C16-8GTZR F4-2400C15-8GVR F4-3000C16-8GTZR 32GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	74.5% Very good	MC Read 26.7 MC Write 28.4 MC Mixed 22.8 74% 26 GB/s	SC Read 18.6 SC Write 29.9 SC Mixed 22.5 68% 23.7 GB/s	Latency 64.1 62% 64.1 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 74.5% Great: 86%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 804 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 90%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 77%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 1 - $131

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $230Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	477x
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	79x
Core i5-7600KIntel $190Bench 76%, 195,006 samples	76x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	91x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	84x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	74x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	35x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	25x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	25x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	30x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	21x
Vengeance LED DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $161Bench 85%, 35,811 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 82% - Excellent

Total price: $894

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16