| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 22.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 93.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus P8P67 LE (all builds) |
| Memory | 9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20110211 |
| Uptime | 4.1 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 22 '19 at 11:29 |
| Run Duration | 143 Seconds |
| Run User | AUS-User |
| Background CPU | 43% |
PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
65.2%
Good
|
67% 112 Pts
|
39% 304 Pts
|
23% 372 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 85D6) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 382.5
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
22.1%
Poor
|
21% 23.7 fps
|
24% 29.7 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
114GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 355 302 300 294 292 292 MB/s
|
93.8%
Outstanding
|
84% 373 MB/s
|
133% 47.4 MB/s
|
279% 375 MB/s
|
|
Hitachi HDS721616PLA380 165GB-$46
153GB free
Firmware: P22OAB3A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 69 70 69 69 69 MB/s
|
39.6%
Below average
|
46% 62 MB/s
|
147% 1.07 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2017)-$88
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 138 145 144 145 148 MB/s
|
||||
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
|
44.1%
Average
|
43% 15 GB/s
|
38% 13.4 GB/s
|
52% 76.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P8P67 LE Builds (Compare 1,235 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P8P67 LE - $113
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 308x |
| Core i7-2600Intel $195Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 230x |
| Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples | 213x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 86x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 82x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 72x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 58% - Above average | Total price: $639 |