Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	25.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	114% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock H97 Performance (all builds)
Memory	3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit색, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit색
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150518
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jan 22 '19 at 07:09
Run Duration	139 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4690-$52 73,695 User benchmarks, average bench 67% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	80.6% Excellent	Memory 91.5 1-Core 109 2-Core 214 79% 138 Pts	4-Core 404 8-Core 404 54% 404 Pts	64-Core 410 25% 410 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 80.6% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209 161,132 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Zotac(19DA 3265) 2GB CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 417.71 Performing below potential (65^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	25.7% Poor	Lighting 29 Reflection 29 Parallax 36.7 24% 31.6 fps	MRender 40.4 Gravity 38 Splatting 32.3 30% 36.9 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 25.7% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$115 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 151GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 351 413 455 449 422 420 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	114% Outstanding	Read 458 Write 465 Mixed 344 SusWrite 418 95% 421 MB/s	4K Read 40.3 4K Write 116 4K Mixed 52.7 190% 69.6 MB/s	DQ Read 182 DQ Write 346 DQ Mixed 330 232% 286 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 124%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 931GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 154 155 156 157 156 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 198 Write 92.3 Mixed 94.5 SusWrite 155 99% 135 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1.1 230% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 109%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB-$9 17,023 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 13GB free, PID 5581 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 23 23 23 23 21 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	15.7% Very poor	Read 35.5 Write 22 Mixed 25.5 SusWrite 22.4 34% 26.4 MB/s	4K Read 4.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 2.5 153% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 15.7% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 2x4GB 14,844 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	56.7% Above average	MC Read 20.2 MC Write 21.1 MC Mixed 17.4 56% 19.6 GB/s	SC Read 13.9 SC Write 19.5 SC Mixed 16.7 48% 16.7 GB/s	Latency 64.9 62% 64.9 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 56.7% Great: 59%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 43%

Speed boat

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 37%

Jet ski

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	18x
840 Evo 120GBSamsung $85Bench 91%, 104,444 samples	16x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $37Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	13x

RAM
RipjawsX DDR3 2133 C9 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 67%, 1,884 samples	19x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	16x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 56%, 22,320 samples	14x

Value: 60% - Above average

Total price: $819

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16