Gigabyte GA-970A-D3P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics52.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-970A-D3P  (all builds)
Memory7.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160226
Uptime6.2 Days
Run DateJan 22 '19 at 03:21
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
62.3% Good
Memory 79.1
1-Core 69.4
2-Core 130
57% 92.7 Pts
4-Core 247
8-Core 356
38% 301 Pts
64-Core 372
23% 372 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Asus(1043 85C5) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 417.35
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52.8% Above average
Lighting 65.2
Reflection 66.9
Parallax 63.7
53% 65.2 fps
MRender 65
Gravity 61.8
Splatting 64.4
52% 63.7 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingmax 120GB 120GB
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M1024E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 140 140 122 140 121 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
63.7% Good
Read 454
Write 140
Mixed 196
SusWrite 134
51% 231 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 49.7
4K Mixed 26.9
93% 32.6 MB/s
DQ Read 250
DQ Write 140
DQ Mixed 28
65% 139 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 86%
WD Blue 3D 250GB-$31
140GB free
Firmware: X61130WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 251 199 200 200 200 199 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Read 432
Write 401
Mixed 271
SusWrite 208
73% 328 MB/s
4K Read 31.3
4K Write 70.4
4K Mixed 39.3
135% 47 MB/s
DQ Read 279
DQ Write 238
DQ Mixed 241
185% 253 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 105%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
2TB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 131 132 134 133 129 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
87.1% Excellent
Read 173
Write 166
Mixed 20.8
SusWrite 131
88% 122 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.5
142% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$63
466GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 126 128 129 130 130 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Read 123
Write 97
Mixed 69.8
SusWrite 128
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
155% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$51
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 131 132 134 133 129 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Read 134
Write 153
Mixed 55.5
SusWrite 131
86% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 6.8
4K Mixed 0.8
240% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38.9% Below average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 13.3
MC Mixed 13.6
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 10
24% 8.37 GB/s
Latency 82.3
49% 82.3 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-970A-D3P Builds (Compare 635 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-970A-D3P - $248

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $401
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback