Asus Crosshair V Formula

Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	18.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	78.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus Crosshair V Formula (all builds)
Memory	12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110927
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 21 '19 at 17:57
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% AM3r2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	66.5% Good	Memory 87.7 1-Core 46.7 2-Core 130 55% 88.1 Pts	4-Core 245 8-Core 437 41% 341 Pts	64-Core 433 27% 433 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 66.5% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Sapphire(1DA2 E366) CLim: 1411 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.1.1 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	18.5% Very poor	Lighting 0.07 Reflection 70.6 Parallax 96.6 0% 55.8 fps	MRender 71.5 Gravity 71.7 Splatting 58.9 54% 67.4 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 18.5% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40 53,931 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 168GB free (System drive) Firmware: X31200RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 252 216 205 212 219 219 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	78.7% Very good	Read 479 Write 430 Mixed 267 SusWrite 220 78% 349 MB/s	4K Read 26.8 4K Write 56.3 4K Mixed 32.2 112% 38.4 MB/s	DQ Read 273 DQ Write 243 DQ Mixed 225 178% 247 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 78.7% Great: 101%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$54 237,241 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 279GB free Firmware: M3CR022 SusWrite @10s intervals: 413 389 420 420 403 375 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 476 Write 439 Mixed 388 SusWrite 403 96% 427 MB/s	4K Read 33.5 4K Write 85.7 4K Mixed 48.6 158% 55.9 MB/s	DQ Read 253 DQ Write 241 DQ Mixed 232 178% 242 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 125%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64 143,477 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 241GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 121 123 123 123 123 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	74.7% Very good	Read 138 Write 136 Mixed 111 SusWrite 122 94% 127 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 0.9 185% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 74.7% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16GB 70,565 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	45.4% Average	MC Read 17 MC Write 15.4 MC Mixed 15.6 46% 16 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 9.2 SC Mixed 12.8 30% 10.6 GB/s	Latency 69.8 57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 45.4% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Crosshair V Formula Builds (Compare 273 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 26%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair V Formula - $220

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	82x
FX-8150AMD $770Bench 59%, 22,181 samples	53x
FX-8120AMDBench 56%, 25,690 samples	29x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	20x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	15x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	13x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	12x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	11x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	9x

RAM
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	170x
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	35x
32GBUnknownBench 53%, 5,781 samples	31x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $680

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16