Asrock FM2A75M-HD+

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics45.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive32.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A75M-HD+  (all builds)
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150522
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 21 '19 at 17:01
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-6600K APU-$88
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Memory 83.8
1-Core 64.6
2-Core 130
57% 92.9 Pts
4-Core 187
8-Core 220
26% 204 Pts
64-Core 218
14% 218 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1268 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.12.1
Performing below potential (69th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
45.9% Average
Lighting 56.6
Reflection 63.2
Parallax 75.1
46% 65 fps
MRender 64.3
Gravity 49.2
Splatting 54
45% 55.8 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$30
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 45 2.5 68 55 18 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
32.4% Below average
Read 182
Write 115
Mixed 144
SusWrite 62.8
28% 126 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 31.5
4K Mixed 14.6
67% 22.4 MB/s
DQ Read 17.7
DQ Write 33.8
DQ Mixed 17.7
16% 23.1 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 85%
Transcend SSD370 256GB-$110
101GB free
Firmware: N1114B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 116 117 124 124 126 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
60.6% Good
Read 370
Write 280
Mixed 245
SusWrite 127
57% 256 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 60.6
4K Mixed 33.6
114% 39.9 MB/s
DQ Read 28.2
DQ Write 87
DQ Mixed 39.6
36% 51.6 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 96%
Kingston A400 120GB-$30
100GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 116 117 124 124 126 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Read 330
Write 145
Mixed 255
SusWrite 127
48% 214 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 59.4
4K Mixed 32.8
117% 40.3 MB/s
DQ Read 32.5
DQ Write 77.6
DQ Mixed 38.9
34% 49.7 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5584-005.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.9% Below average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 11.7
32% 11.3 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 10.7
26% 9 GB/s
Latency 73.7
54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A75M-HD+ Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A75M-HD+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $116
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback