Asrock X370 Gaming K4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics76.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive69.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X370 Gaming K4  (all builds)
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170410
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateJan 21 '19 at 03:09
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 33%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
66.8% Good
Memory 65.2
1-Core 102
2-Core 192
67% 120 Pts
4-Core 367
8-Core 594
59% 481 Pts
64-Core 805
50% 805 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
Zotac(19DA 1445) ≥ 4GB;
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.71
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
76.4% Very good
Lighting 95.5
Reflection 105
Parallax 96
78% 98.7 fps
MRender 89.9
Gravity 88.9
Splatting 91
74% 89.9 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY SSD2SC240G1CS1754D117-820 240GB
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS111101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 245 201 269 212 146 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
69.8% Good
Read 359
Write 274
Mixed 216
SusWrite 213
59% 266 MB/s
4K Read 19.3
4K Write 59.5
4K Mixed 28.7
98% 35.8 MB/s
DQ Read 270
DQ Write 272
DQ Mixed 175
158% 239 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 87%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
520GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 385 399 308 405 435 403 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 458
Write 408
Mixed 407
SusWrite 389
94% 415 MB/s
4K Read 33.6
4K Write 79.2
4K Mixed 45.9
152% 52.9 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 353
DQ Mixed 363
273% 366 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 106%
Great: 133%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$50
2.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 132 100 135 136 126 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
79.3% Very good
Read 149
Write 132
Mixed 91.8
SusWrite 127
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2134 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
60.7% Good
MC Read 25.3
MC Write 20.7
MC Mixed 23.1
66% 23 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 13.3
37% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X370 Gaming K4 Builds (Compare 196 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Gaming K4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $749
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback