Asus TUF Z270 MARK 1

Performance Results


Gaming 117% UFO	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 104% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	130% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	80.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z270 MARK 1 (all builds)
Memory	23.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.5 GHz
Display	3840 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20170322
Uptime	3.5 Days
Run Date	Jan 21 '19 at 02:53
Run Duration	195 Seconds
Run User	EST-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230 712,312 User benchmarks, average bench 84% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	88.7% Excellent	Memory 97.4 1-Core 141 2-Core 240 92% 159 Pts	4-Core 430 8-Core 779 73% 605 Pts	64-Core 782 48% 782 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 88.7% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Zotac(19DA 1471) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 2800 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 417.71 Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	130% Outstanding	Lighting 179 Reflection 202 Parallax 192 146% 191 fps	MRender 129 Gravity 190 Splatting 125 120% 148 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 130% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Corsair Force MP500 NVMe PCIe M.2 120GB-$69 11,475 User benchmarks, average bench 128% 52GB free (System drive) Firmware: E7FM Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 287 112 108 106 112 111 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	80.2% Excellent	Read 717 Write 654 Mixed 220 SusWrite 139 96% 433 MB/s	4K Read 15.2 4K Write 33.3 4K Mixed 19.1 65% 22.5 MB/s	DQ Read 340 DQ Write 692 DQ Mixed 357 316% 463 MB/s
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 80.2% Great: 185%
Kingston SSDNow V+200 Series 120GB 853 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 41GB free Firmware: 507KC4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 87 86 94 95 91 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	45.2% Average	Read 160 Write 106 Mixed 134 SusWrite 90.9 28% 123 MB/s	4K Read 22.5 4K Write 59.3 4K Mixed 24.6 97% 35.5 MB/s	DQ Read 97.4 DQ Write 62.5 DQ Mixed 69.9 55% 76.6 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 45.2% Great: 83%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 402GB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 100 98 97 96 100 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	72.2% Very good	Read 154 Write 122 Mixed 35.8 SusWrite 97.8 74% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 141% 1 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 72.2% Great: 107%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 1TB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 136 117 137 118 137 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	82.1% Excellent	Read 158 Write 149 Mixed 31 SusWrite 128 84% 117 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 82.1% Great: 108%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 280GB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 86 80 83 81 82 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	54.4% Above average	Read 107 Write 94 Mixed 43 SusWrite 82.1 60% 81.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.6 131% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 54.4% Great: 107%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 132GB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 89 85 86 85 87 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	72.7% Very good	Read 167 Write 159 Mixed 23.3 SusWrite 86.5 78% 109 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.6 131% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 72.7% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMR32GX4M4C3466C16 4x8GB 1,229 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3467 MHz Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	112% Outstanding	MC Read 41.4 MC Write 43.6 MC Mixed 35.9 115% 40.3 GB/s	SC Read 22.4 SC Write 43.4 SC Mixed 31.3 92% 32.4 GB/s	Latency 48.5 82% 48.5 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 135%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 804 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 90%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 77%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 1 - $131

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $230Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	477x
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	79x
Core i5-7600KIntel $190Bench 76%, 195,006 samples	76x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	91x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	84x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	74x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	35x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	25x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	25x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	30x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	21x
Vengeance LED DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $161Bench 85%, 35,811 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 82% - Excellent

Total price: $894

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16