Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results


Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	23.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	82.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 (all builds)
Memory	11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171207
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Jan 20 '19 at 19:16
Run Duration	171 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.95 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	85.6% Excellent	Memory 81.7 1-Core 120 2-Core 237 81% 146 Pts	4-Core 479 8-Core 886 82% 683 Pts	64-Core 1292 80% 1292 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 85.6% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Gigabyte(1458 371D) CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2040 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.71 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	23.5% Poor	Lighting 32.1 Reflection 31.5 Parallax 22.4 26% 28.7 fps	MRender 31.4 Gravity 16 Splatting 21.4 18% 22.9 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 23.5% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ AMD Radeon R7 120GB-$67 1,123 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 44GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 335 206 171 156 143 145 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	82.7% Excellent	Read 424 Write 437 Mixed 310 SusWrite 193 76% 341 MB/s	4K Read 26.3 4K Write 80.7 4K Mixed 34.4 127% 47.1 MB/s	DQ Read 333 DQ Write 343 DQ Mixed 242 208% 306 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 82.7% Great: 104%
Team L3 SSD 120GB 863 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 92GB free Firmware: S9FM02.6 SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 140 143 141 145 147 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	61.8% Good	Read 442 Write 144 Mixed 194 SusWrite 144 51% 231 MB/s	4K Read 30.9 4K Write 57.8 4K Mixed 21.6 105% 36.8 MB/s	DQ Read 97 DQ Write 87.1 DQ Mixed 3 27% 62.4 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 61.8% Great: 71%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$33 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 160GB free Firmware: CC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 114 118 114 117 119 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	72.1% Very good	Read 135 Write 135 Mixed 75.7 SusWrite 116 85% 116 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 168% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 72.1% Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51 462,780 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 1TB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 170 170 170 166 170 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 184 Write 148 Mixed 81.7 SusWrite 168 106% 145 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 114%
WD Elements 25A3 4TB 7,568 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 3TB free, PID 25a3 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 169 169 170 169 168 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	68.9% Good	Read 165 Write 163 Mixed 126 SusWrite 169 211% 156 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 126% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 68.9% Great: 105%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GB 8,117 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3066 MHz Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	98.9% Outstanding	MC Read 41 MC Write 35 MC Mixed 32.3 103% 36.1 GB/s	SC Read 21.9 SC Write 37.5 SC Mixed 26.8 82% 28.7 GB/s	Latency 77.4 52% 77.4 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 98.9% Great: 120%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K7 Builds (Compare 523 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 77%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

CPU
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	96x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	69x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	59x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	67x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	57x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	28x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	22x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	20x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	17x

RAM
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	20x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	18x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $871

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)