Prestigio PSB133S01ZFH

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemPrestigio PSB133S01ZFH  (all builds)
MotherboardWeibu To be filled by O.E.M.
Memory1.4 GB free of 3 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180202
Uptime7.1 Days
Run DateJan 20 '19 at 08:11
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N3350
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
27.4% Poor
Memory 39.4
1-Core 47.7
2-Core 91.8
34% 59.6 Pts
4-Core 90.4
8-Core 91.5
12% 90.9 Pts
64-Core 89
6% 89 Pts
Poor: 9%
This bench: 27.4%
Great: 30%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4839
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.78% Terrible
Lighting 2.17
Reflection 1.04
Parallax 1.5
2% 1.57 fps
MRender 2.52
Gravity 1.43
Splatting 2.57
2% 2.17 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.78%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft Storage Space Device 126GB
110GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 269 292 293 293 307 310 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
49.4% Average
Read 303
Write 312
Mixed 295
SusWrite 294
68% 301 MB/s
4K Read 6.1
4K Write 45.7
4K Mixed 12.4
49% 21.4 MB/s
DQ Read 105
DQ Write 86.8
DQ Mixed 98.6
73% 96.9 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
ABCD 123456789012345678 2x1.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
3GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
17.1% Very poor
MC Read 5.4
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 6
18% 6.13 GB/s
SC Read 3.2
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 3.7
11% 3.77 GB/s
Latency 205
20% 205 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 27%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PSB133S01ZFH Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 19%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: Prestigio PSB133S01ZFH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback