| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 17.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 114% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
| Memory | 6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus H81M-A (all builds) |
| Memory | 4.5 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20130718 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 20 '19 at 06:35 |
| Run Duration | 130 Seconds |
| Run User | KOR-User |
| Background CPU | 43% |
PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
58.9%
Above average
|
65% 108 Pts
|
22% 167 Pts
|
10% 170 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-$188
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
CLim: 822 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
|
17.3%
Very poor
|
16% 20.6 fps
|
19% 23.3 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$115
133GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 349 456 462 488 489 489 MB/s
|
114%
Outstanding
|
98% 433 MB/s
|
173% 61.6 MB/s
|
214% 284 MB/s
|
|
Toshiba MK3265GSX 320GB-$91
298GB free
Firmware: GJ002H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 86 86 86 87 87 MB/s
|
48.2%
Average
|
50% 69 MB/s
|
108% 0.9 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 M378B5173QH0-CK0 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
29.2%
Poor
|
27% 9.33 GB/s
|
23% 7.97 GB/s
|
59% 68.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H81M-A Builds (Compare 1,307 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus H81M-A - $76
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples | 236x |
| Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 123x |
| Core i5-4440Intel $128Bench 61%, 81,111 samples | 109x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 175x |
| HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples | 116x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 107x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $313 |