Supermicro X9SRL-F

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 44% Speed boat	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 39% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	55.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Supermicro X9SRL-F (all builds)
Motherboard	Supermicro X9SRL-F
Memory	58.9 GB free of 64.0078 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120416
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jan 20 '19 at 00:57
Run Duration	105 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2667 0 652 User benchmarks, average bench 72% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	72.1% Very good	Memory 89.5 1-Core 84.1 2-Core 169 68% 114 Pts	4-Core 296 8-Core 502 48% 399 Pts	64-Core 622 38% 622 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 72.1% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Asus(1043 04C2) CLim: 1405 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.1.1 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	55.3% Above average	Lighting 69.9 Reflection 72 Parallax 87.2 57% 76.4 fps	MRender 67.1 Gravity 68.2 Splatting 57.8 52% 64.4 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 55.3% Great: 49%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HGST Ultrastar He8 Helium 8TB-$94 1,061 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 7TB free (System drive) Firmware: A4GNT514 SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 184 189 179 183 180 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 170 Write 179 Mixed 77.5 SusWrite 185 112% 153 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 1.1 197% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 36JDZS2G72PZ-1G9E 36JDZS2G72PZ-1G9E 36JDZS2G72PZ-1G9E 36JDZS2G72PZ-1G9E Winbond 25X/Q Series 64GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 0 MHz 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 8 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	95.7% Outstanding	MC Read 40 MC Write 38.6 MC Mixed 35.2 108% 37.9 GB/s	SC Read 13.7 SC Write 11.5 SC Mixed 11.8 35% 12.3 GB/s	Latency 67.9 59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 96% ↑ This bench: 95.7% Great: 96%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X9SRL-F Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 17%

Surfboard

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 15%

Surfboard

System: Supermicro X9SRL-F

CPU
Xeon E5-1620 v2Intel $345Bench 71%, 10,301 samples	2x
Xeon E5-2640 v2IntelBench 59%, 406 samples	1x
Xeon E5-2620 v2IntelBench 60%, 2,742 samples	1x

GPU
RX 550AMD $79Bench 14%, 79,894 samples	2x
R9 270XAMD $199Bench 27%, 77,943 samples	2x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	1x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	2x
Ultra II 480GBSanDisk $39Bench 86%, 62,883 samples	1x
X100 128GBSanDiskBench 73%, 1,695 samples	1x

RAM
36KSF1G72PZ-1G4M1 4x8GBMicronBench 70%, 42 samples	2x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 4x8GBCorsairBench 83%, 559 samples	1x
BLS8G3D169DS3.16F 4x8GBCrucialBench 83%, 25 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $504

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16