Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	26.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	60.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Asus TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX504GM
Memory	10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180724
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 19 '19 at 12:12
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8750H 442,631 User benchmarks, average bench 70% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	64.2% Good	Memory 65.4 1-Core 88.1 2-Core 153 59% 102 Pts	4-Core 342 8-Core 476 52% 409 Pts	64-Core 618 38% 618 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 64.2% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile) 177,775 User benchmarks, average bench 47% Asus(1043 1391) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.1771 Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	26.2% Poor	Lighting 34.6 Reflection 25.3 Parallax 30.6 28% 30.1 fps	MRender 8.86 Gravity 17.1 Splatting 47.2 22% 24.4 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 26.2% Great: 52%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GB 50,765 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 114GB free (System drive) Firmware: M0MA031 SusWrite @10s intervals: 266 276 278 242 140 142 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	60.7% Good	Read 370 Write 314 Mixed 297 SusWrite 224 68% 301 MB/s	4K Read 11.1 4K Write 40.7 4K Mixed 22.8 68% 24.9 MB/s	DQ Read 236 DQ Write 249 DQ Mixed 291 205% 259 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 60.7% Great: 91%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB 179,769 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 794GB free Firmware: JU0C0J SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 120 125 126 125 127 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	78.4% Very good	Read 147 Write 145 Mixed 58.2 SusWrite 125 86% 119 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 6.1 4K Mixed 0.6 234% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 78.4% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA82GS6CJR8N-VK 1x16GB 33,430 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	38.5% Below average	MC Read 14.4 MC Write 14.2 MC Mixed 11.9 39% 13.5 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 12 SC Mixed 12 32% 11.3 GB/s	Latency 113 36% 113 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 38.5% Great: 49%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 35%

Sail boat

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 30%

Sail boat

CPU
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	732x
Core i5-8300HIntelBench 65%, 167,898 samples	481x

GPU
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples	635x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	577x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	1x

SSD
RBUSNS8154P3256GJ 256GBKingstonBench 96%, 18,615 samples	218x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 72%, 50,765 samples	199x
RBUSNS8154P3128GJ 128GBKingstonBench 81%, 18,233 samples	172x

RAM
HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 73,050 samples	234x
HMA82GS6CJR8N-VK 1x16GBHynixBench 44%, 33,430 samples	175x
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 96,646 samples	86x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16