| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 29.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 71.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus H110M-K (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 8.1 |
| BIOS Date | 20160520 |
| Uptime | 1 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 19 '19 at 00:30 |
| Run Duration | 136 Seconds |
| Run User | HKG-User |
| Background CPU | 21% |
PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
57.3%
Above average
|
70% 120 Pts
|
26% 190 Pts
|
12% 192 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 417.35
|
29.3%
Poor
|
30% 32.2 fps
|
29% 35.4 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Apacer AS330 120GB
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AP122PD0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 81 63 64 60 35 MB/s
|
71.3%
Very good
|
54% 243 MB/s
|
113% 43.2 MB/s
|
173% 272 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 500GB-$49
51GB free
Firmware: 0001TSM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 61 55 61 61 57 MB/s
|
38.6%
Below average
|
46% 62.7 MB/s
|
127% 0.87 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
32.6%
Below average
|
31% 11 GB/s
|
24% 8.23 GB/s
|
52% 77.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H110M-K Builds (Compare 5,920 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus H110M-K
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 1,115x |
| Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples | 639x |
| Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples | 554x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 841x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 469x |
| HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples | 367x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 86% - Excellent | Total price: $182 |